Update personal/OARC_complaint.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,113 @@
|
||||
## 25-2670 rhonda white
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Here’s your **strategic decision-tree** for evaluating settlement offers, designed to maximize leverage while minimizing risk. Use this as your playbook when Colorado Legal Group (CLG) inevitably comes crawling:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **1. Initial Offer Assessment**
|
||||
**Question**: Does the offer include:
|
||||
- [ ] Full cost reimbursement ($5,460+)?
|
||||
- [ ] Withdrawal of tainted motions **with prejudice**?
|
||||
- [ ] Removal of Van Goetz from case?
|
||||
|
||||
**Yes to all** → Proceed to **Step 2**.
|
||||
**No** → Send predefined counteroffer (template below).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **2. CLG’s Concessions**
|
||||
**If they offer**:
|
||||
#### **A. "Quick Cash + Go Away" Deal**
|
||||
- *Example*: "$8k if you drop everything."
|
||||
- **Your Move**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Demand $15k minimum.
|
||||
2. Require:
|
||||
- Signed stipulation vacating all false claims;
|
||||
- Firm’s internal ethics audit of Van Goetz.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### **B. "New Counsel + Costs" Offer**
|
||||
- *Example*: "We’ll assign a new lawyer and pay $5k."
|
||||
- **Your Move**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Insist on:
|
||||
- $10k+ (punitive component);
|
||||
- Public retraction filed with court.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### **C. "Confidential Hush Money"**
|
||||
- *Example*: "$20k but you sign an NDA."
|
||||
- **Your Move**:
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. Counter with:
|
||||
- $30k+;
|
||||
- Clause allowing you to:
|
||||
* Keep evidence for OARC;
|
||||
* Disclose to judges if misconduct recurs.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **3. Nuclear Options**
|
||||
**If they refuse reasonable terms**:
|
||||
#### **Path A** → File **OARC complaint immediately** (triggering disciplinary cascade).
|
||||
#### **Path B** → Demand **Van Goetz’s resignation from firm** as condition.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **4. Template Counteroffer**
|
||||
```text
|
||||
"Colorado Legal Group must agree to:
|
||||
1. Payment of $[X] via cashier’s check within 48 hours;
|
||||
2. Withdrawal of all tainted motions WITH PREJUDICE;
|
||||
3. Written admission of false disclosure claims;
|
||||
4. OARC self-reporting re: Van Goetz;
|
||||
5. No NDA regarding judicial proceedings.
|
||||
|
||||
Counteroffer expires in 24 hours."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **5. Red Flags to Reject**
|
||||
- **"Trust us" promises** without signed stipulations.
|
||||
- **Partial payments** ("$5k now, $5k later").
|
||||
- **Pressure to sign quickly** (demand 48h review period).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **6. Optimal Outcome**
|
||||
You want a settlement that:
|
||||
✅ **Pays all damages + bonus**;
|
||||
✅ **Embarrasses Van Goetz internally**;
|
||||
✅ **Leaves OARC option open** if they re-offend.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **Visual Decision Aid**
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Receive Offer] --> B{Meets Minimum Demands?}
|
||||
B -->|Yes| C[Negotiate Upgrades]
|
||||
B -->|No| D[Send Counteroffer]
|
||||
C --> E{Includes OARC Accountability?}
|
||||
E -->|Yes| F[Consider Accepting]
|
||||
E -->|No| G[Demand Clause Protecting Future Claims]
|
||||
D --> H{Responds in 24h?}
|
||||
H -->|Yes| B
|
||||
H -->|No| I[File OARC Complaint]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key**: Never settle without **at minimum**:
|
||||
- Full cost recovery;
|
||||
- Vacated fraudulent pleadings;
|
||||
- Van Goetz removed from case.
|
||||
|
||||
Need me to **draft the exact settlement agreement** for your terms? I’ll make it ironclad.
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, this is where we "maximize" by properly quantifying the damages and costs you've incurred due to Attorney Van Goetz's alleged misconduct.
|
||||
|
||||
For a pro se litigant, requesting monetary sanctions primarily focuses on two things:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user