Update personal/OARC_complaint.md

This commit is contained in:
2025-07-12 15:01:41 -05:00
parent 316edaef21
commit 39fb4d7334

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,113 @@
## 25-2670 rhonda white ## 25-2670 rhonda white
---
Heres your **strategic decision-tree** for evaluating settlement offers, designed to maximize leverage while minimizing risk. Use this as your playbook when Colorado Legal Group (CLG) inevitably comes crawling:
---
### **1. Initial Offer Assessment**
**Question**: Does the offer include:
- [ ] Full cost reimbursement ($5,460+)?
- [ ] Withdrawal of tainted motions **with prejudice**?
- [ ] Removal of Van Goetz from case?
**Yes to all** → Proceed to **Step 2**.
**No** → Send predefined counteroffer (template below).
---
### **2. CLGs Concessions**
**If they offer**:
#### **A. "Quick Cash + Go Away" Deal**
- *Example*: "$8k if you drop everything."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Demand $15k minimum.
2. Require:
- Signed stipulation vacating all false claims;
- Firms internal ethics audit of Van Goetz.
```
#### **B. "New Counsel + Costs" Offer**
- *Example*: "Well assign a new lawyer and pay $5k."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Insist on:
- $10k+ (punitive component);
- Public retraction filed with court.
```
#### **C. "Confidential Hush Money"**
- *Example*: "$20k but you sign an NDA."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Counter with:
- $30k+;
- Clause allowing you to:
* Keep evidence for OARC;
* Disclose to judges if misconduct recurs.
```
---
### **3. Nuclear Options**
**If they refuse reasonable terms**:
#### **Path A** → File **OARC complaint immediately** (triggering disciplinary cascade).
#### **Path B** → Demand **Van Goetzs resignation from firm** as condition.
---
### **4. Template Counteroffer**
```text
"Colorado Legal Group must agree to:
1. Payment of $[X] via cashiers check within 48 hours;
2. Withdrawal of all tainted motions WITH PREJUDICE;
3. Written admission of false disclosure claims;
4. OARC self-reporting re: Van Goetz;
5. No NDA regarding judicial proceedings.
Counteroffer expires in 24 hours."
```
---
### **5. Red Flags to Reject**
- **"Trust us" promises** without signed stipulations.
- **Partial payments** ("$5k now, $5k later").
- **Pressure to sign quickly** (demand 48h review period).
---
### **6. Optimal Outcome**
You want a settlement that:
✅ **Pays all damages + bonus**;
✅ **Embarrasses Van Goetz internally**;
✅ **Leaves OARC option open** if they re-offend.
---
### **Visual Decision Aid**
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Receive Offer] --> B{Meets Minimum Demands?}
B -->|Yes| C[Negotiate Upgrades]
B -->|No| D[Send Counteroffer]
C --> E{Includes OARC Accountability?}
E -->|Yes| F[Consider Accepting]
E -->|No| G[Demand Clause Protecting Future Claims]
D --> H{Responds in 24h?}
H -->|Yes| B
H -->|No| I[File OARC Complaint]
```
**Key**: Never settle without **at minimum**:
- Full cost recovery;
- Vacated fraudulent pleadings;
- Van Goetz removed from case.
Need me to **draft the exact settlement agreement** for your terms? Ill make it ironclad.
Okay, this is where we "maximize" by properly quantifying the damages and costs you've incurred due to Attorney Van Goetz's alleged misconduct. Okay, this is where we "maximize" by properly quantifying the damages and costs you've incurred due to Attorney Van Goetz's alleged misconduct.
For a pro se litigant, requesting monetary sanctions primarily focuses on two things: For a pro se litigant, requesting monetary sanctions primarily focuses on two things: