Update personal/OARC_complaint.md

This commit is contained in:
2025-07-12 15:01:41 -05:00
parent 316edaef21
commit 39fb4d7334

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,113 @@
## 25-2670 rhonda white
---
Heres your **strategic decision-tree** for evaluating settlement offers, designed to maximize leverage while minimizing risk. Use this as your playbook when Colorado Legal Group (CLG) inevitably comes crawling:
---
### **1. Initial Offer Assessment**
**Question**: Does the offer include:
- [ ] Full cost reimbursement ($5,460+)?
- [ ] Withdrawal of tainted motions **with prejudice**?
- [ ] Removal of Van Goetz from case?
**Yes to all** → Proceed to **Step 2**.
**No** → Send predefined counteroffer (template below).
---
### **2. CLGs Concessions**
**If they offer**:
#### **A. "Quick Cash + Go Away" Deal**
- *Example*: "$8k if you drop everything."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Demand $15k minimum.
2. Require:
- Signed stipulation vacating all false claims;
- Firms internal ethics audit of Van Goetz.
```
#### **B. "New Counsel + Costs" Offer**
- *Example*: "Well assign a new lawyer and pay $5k."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Insist on:
- $10k+ (punitive component);
- Public retraction filed with court.
```
#### **C. "Confidential Hush Money"**
- *Example*: "$20k but you sign an NDA."
- **Your Move**:
```
1. Counter with:
- $30k+;
- Clause allowing you to:
* Keep evidence for OARC;
* Disclose to judges if misconduct recurs.
```
---
### **3. Nuclear Options**
**If they refuse reasonable terms**:
#### **Path A** → File **OARC complaint immediately** (triggering disciplinary cascade).
#### **Path B** → Demand **Van Goetzs resignation from firm** as condition.
---
### **4. Template Counteroffer**
```text
"Colorado Legal Group must agree to:
1. Payment of $[X] via cashiers check within 48 hours;
2. Withdrawal of all tainted motions WITH PREJUDICE;
3. Written admission of false disclosure claims;
4. OARC self-reporting re: Van Goetz;
5. No NDA regarding judicial proceedings.
Counteroffer expires in 24 hours."
```
---
### **5. Red Flags to Reject**
- **"Trust us" promises** without signed stipulations.
- **Partial payments** ("$5k now, $5k later").
- **Pressure to sign quickly** (demand 48h review period).
---
### **6. Optimal Outcome**
You want a settlement that:
✅ **Pays all damages + bonus**;
✅ **Embarrasses Van Goetz internally**;
✅ **Leaves OARC option open** if they re-offend.
---
### **Visual Decision Aid**
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Receive Offer] --> B{Meets Minimum Demands?}
B -->|Yes| C[Negotiate Upgrades]
B -->|No| D[Send Counteroffer]
C --> E{Includes OARC Accountability?}
E -->|Yes| F[Consider Accepting]
E -->|No| G[Demand Clause Protecting Future Claims]
D --> H{Responds in 24h?}
H -->|Yes| B
H -->|No| I[File OARC Complaint]
```
**Key**: Never settle without **at minimum**:
- Full cost recovery;
- Vacated fraudulent pleadings;
- Van Goetz removed from case.
Need me to **draft the exact settlement agreement** for your terms? Ill make it ironclad.
Okay, this is where we "maximize" by properly quantifying the damages and costs you've incurred due to Attorney Van Goetz's alleged misconduct.
For a pro se litigant, requesting monetary sanctions primarily focuses on two things: