Adding Gov contract starting
This commit is contained in:
128
smma/government_contracts.md
Normal file
128
smma/government_contracts.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
Exactly! You've identified the core value proposition. Let me reverse-engineer how he gets from raw data to "GS-14 John Smith at VA Office of Rural Health during their Q2 market research phase for simplified acquisitions under $200K."The breakthrough insight is that he's essentially running an intelligence operation, not a sales process. He's gathering three types of asymmetric information:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **WHO** makes the decisions (names, roles, contact info)
|
||||
2. **WHEN** they make decisions (procurement cycles, market research windows)
|
||||
3. **HOW** they prefer to buy (simplified acquisition vs. full competition, preferred vehicles)
|
||||
|
||||
Then he times his engagement to hit the exact window when:
|
||||
- The buyer is legally allowed to talk to him
|
||||
- His competitors don't know an opportunity exists yet
|
||||
- He can influence requirements before they're locked in
|
||||
|
||||
Your LLM skills could turn this from a manual, one-client-at-a-time process into an automated intelligence pipeline that identifies dozens of these specific targeting opportunities simultaneously.
|
||||
|
||||
The real money isn't in writing better proposals - it's in knowing about opportunities before they become competitive.
|
||||
|
||||
# Reverse Engineering the Intelligence Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
## From Raw Data to Specific Targets: The Conversion Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: USAspending.gov → Office Identification
|
||||
**Raw Input:** $3.7B VA spending in PSC code XYZ
|
||||
**His Process:** Click individual contract awards to see awarding office
|
||||
**Data Points Extracted:**
|
||||
- VA Office of Rural Health: $45M in awards
|
||||
- VA Medical Center Baltimore: $23M in awards
|
||||
- VA Benefits Administration: $12M in awards
|
||||
|
||||
**Intelligence Output:** "2-3 very specific offices within the VA"
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Award History → Buying Pattern Recognition
|
||||
**His Analysis Method:** Look at each office's individual awards over 4 years
|
||||
**Pattern Recognition:**
|
||||
- Office A: Awards $2M-5M contracts through full competition
|
||||
- Office B: Awards $150K-250K contracts through simplified acquisition
|
||||
- Office C: Uses IDIQ vehicles, awards task orders monthly
|
||||
|
||||
**Intelligence Output:** "Some offices openly compete while others use simplified acquisitions"
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Contract Details → Decision Maker Intelligence
|
||||
**Data Mining Process:**
|
||||
- Contract award documents show Contracting Officer names
|
||||
- Performance Work Statements reveal Program Manager requirements
|
||||
- Past performance reviews show technical evaluators
|
||||
|
||||
**Intelligence Output:** "GS-14 John Smith" (the actual decision maker)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Award Timing → Procurement Cycle Mapping
|
||||
**His Timing Analysis:**
|
||||
- Q1: Market research notices published
|
||||
- Q2: RFIs released, industry days held
|
||||
- Q3: RFPs published
|
||||
- Q4: Awards made
|
||||
|
||||
**Intelligence Output:** "Q2 market research phase"
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 5: Dollar Patterns → Acquisition Strategy
|
||||
**Threshold Analysis:**
|
||||
- 60% of awards under $250K (simplified acquisition)
|
||||
- 30% of awards $250K-$10M (full competition)
|
||||
- 10% of awards over $10M (major systems)
|
||||
|
||||
**Intelligence Output:** "Simplified acquisitions under $200K"
|
||||
|
||||
## The Data Sources He's Actually Using (But Doesn't Fully Reveal)
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Sources
|
||||
1. **USAspending.gov** - Contract awards, dollars, offices
|
||||
2. **SAM.gov** - Current opportunities, past solicitations
|
||||
3. **Federal Business Opportunities Archive** - Historical RFPs/sources sought
|
||||
|
||||
### Hidden Sources (Implied)
|
||||
4. **GovWin/Deltek** - Contracting officer databases, pipeline intelligence
|
||||
5. **LinkedIn Government** - Decision maker profiles, org charts
|
||||
6. **Agency budget documents** - Future spending priorities
|
||||
7. **FOIA requests** - Internal procurement forecasts
|
||||
|
||||
## The LLM Automation Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Aggregation Prompts
|
||||
"Extract from these 200 contract awards: contracting officer names, program manager emails, award timing patterns, dollar thresholds, and procurement vehicles used"
|
||||
|
||||
### Pattern Recognition Prompts
|
||||
"Analyze this office's 4-year award history and identify: 1) Preferred contract vehicles, 2) Seasonal award patterns, 3) Dollar threshold preferences, 4) Incumbent contractor rotation patterns"
|
||||
|
||||
### Relationship Mapping Prompts
|
||||
"Cross-reference these contracting officers with: 1) Their LinkedIn profiles, 2) Professional conference speaker lists, 3) Industry publication quotes, 4) Government directory listings to build complete contact profiles"
|
||||
|
||||
### Timing Prediction Prompts
|
||||
"Based on this office's historical procurement cycles, predict: 1) When market research will begin for FY26 requirements, 2) Optimal engagement windows, 3) Key milestone dates for relationship building"
|
||||
|
||||
## The Million Dollar Process Map
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Office Intelligence (Weeks 1-2)
|
||||
- Mine USAspending for office-level spending patterns
|
||||
- Identify 3-5 offices with consistent spending in your space
|
||||
- Map each office's preferred acquisition methods
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: People Intelligence (Weeks 3-4)
|
||||
- Extract contracting officer and program manager names from awards
|
||||
- Build LinkedIn/contact profiles for key decision makers
|
||||
- Identify their professional networks and interests
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Timing Intelligence (Weeks 5-6)
|
||||
- Map each office's historical procurement cycles
|
||||
- Identify market research windows for next 12 months
|
||||
- Create engagement calendar with specific target dates
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Relationship Execution (Weeks 7-52)
|
||||
- Engage during legal market research phases
|
||||
- Submit targeted RFI responses
|
||||
- Attend industry days and networking events
|
||||
- Build relationships before RFPs drop
|
||||
|
||||
## The Real Secret Sauce
|
||||
|
||||
He's not just finding opportunities - he's **manufacturing competitive advantages** by:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Information Asymmetry:** Knowing details about buyers that competitors don't
|
||||
2. **Timing Asymmetry:** Engaging during windows when competitors aren't active
|
||||
3. **Relationship Asymmetry:** Having existing relationships when RFPs are released
|
||||
|
||||
The $25K-$50K/month he mentions isn't from winning more contracts - it's from winning contracts with **less competition** because he's positioned himself before the crowd arrives.
|
||||
|
||||
## Your LLM Edge
|
||||
|
||||
You could systematically execute this intelligence gathering across 50+ offices simultaneously, creating a continuous pipeline of "GS-14 John Smith" level targeting intelligence that would take human analysts months to develop manually.
|
||||
|
||||
The key insight: **This isn't market research - it's competitive intelligence gathering that creates unfair advantages in timing and positioning.**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user