medusa/the_information_nexus
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add work/tbx/ask.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
medusa
2024-04-19 17:41:36 +00:00
parent ad9014b2d3
commit 721d69da0c
1 changed files with 85 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

85
work/tbx/ask.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
Certainly! I'll provide multiple variations for each section, so you can pick and choose the elements that resonate best. Feel free to mix and match across the variations to create a response that fits your needs.
Priorities and needle movers:
Variation 1:
- Leveraging Meraki's robust API to automate network provisioning and management tasks
- Implementing Fortinet's Security Fabric to provide comprehensive, integrated protection across the entire digital attack surface
- Deploying a SOAR solution to streamline incident response and optimize security operations
- Utilizing EDR to proactively hunt for and mitigate advanced threats
Variation 2:
- Integrating Meraki, Fortinet, and other best-of-breed tools to create a unified, automated network and security stack
- Building custom applications and workflows using the Meraki Dashboard API to drive business value
- Enhancing infrastructure resilience and scalability through the adoption of cloud-managed networking solutions
- Improving digital experience by correlating data from network performance monitoring and application performance management tools
Key architectures/technologies:
Variation 1:
- Meraki's cloud-based platform for simplified management of wireless, switching, security, and IoT devices
- Fortinet's FortiGate next-generation firewalls for advanced threat protection and SD-WAN capabilities
- Ansible for infrastructure-as-code and network automation at scale
- Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions like CrowdStrike or SentinelOne for advanced threat hunting and remediation
Variation 2:
- Software-defined networking (SDN) principles leveraging Meraki and other programmable network solutions
- Fortinet's Security Fabric architecture to enable broad visibility, integrated protection, and automated operations
- Cloud-hosted DDI (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) for centralized, software-driven control of core network services
- Security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) tools like Splunk Phantom or Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Resources assessment:
Variation 1:
- Existing team has strong skills in network engineering and security operations but may need to upskill in areas like Python scripting and API integration
- Dedicated automation specialists could accelerate our infrastructure-as-code initiatives
- Cross-training between NetOps and SecOps teams would improve collaboration and break down silos
Variation 2:
- Current personnel have deep knowledge of Meraki, Fortinet and Ansible but may require additional training on SOAR and EDR solutions
- Augmenting the team with data scientists and developers could unlock new use cases leveraging the Meraki Dashboard API
- Creating a Cloud Center of Excellence would provide governance and best practices as we transition to cloud-managed networking
Potential barriers:
Variation 1:
- Complex, heterogeneous environment with multiple management platforms and limited API support in some areas
- Organizational resistance to change and preference for manual processes over automation
- Lack of clear strategy and prioritization from leadership on digital transformation initiatives
- Inconsistent adherence to security best practices and policies across the organization
Variation 2:
- Technical debt and legacy systems that are difficult to integrate and automate
- Skill gaps in areas like data engineering, API development, and cloud native technologies
- Procurement and budgeting processes that don't align with the fast pace of technological change
- Difficulty quantifying the ROI of automation and justifying the upfront investments required
Process issues:
Variation 1:
- Immature incident response processes that rely heavily on manual triage and analysis
- Inconsistent change management procedures leading to unplanned outages and performance issues
- Security and compliance controls that impede agility and slow down the pace of innovation
- Lack of standardized development processes and CI/CD pipelines for network automation code
Variation 2:
- Reactive rather than proactive problem management resulting in "firefighting" mode
- Insufficient monitoring and observability of the end-to-end network and security stack
- Disconnect between the NetOps and SecOps teams in terms of priorities, tooling, and processes
- Over-reliance on tribal knowledge and lack of documentation for key systems and workflows
Resource issues:
Variation 1:
- Difficulty attracting and retaining top talent in a competitive job market
- Limited training and professional development opportunities for engineers to keep up with the latest technologies
- Budget constraints forcing tradeoffs between innovation and "keeping the lights on"
- Lack of diversity in the team leading to blind spots and missed opportunities
Variation 2:
- Workforce spread thin supporting too many different tools and platforms
- Vendor lock-in and unpredictable pricing models for some of our core systems
- Shortage of personnel with experience in both networking and security disciplines
- Inability to scale the team quickly enough to meet the growing demands of the business
Team issues:
Variation 1:
- Communication breakdowns and lack of visibility between different groups working on network and security projects
- Unclear roles and responsibilities leading to duplication of effort and missed handoffs
- Cultural divide between the "old guard" and the "new guard" in terms of embracing innovation and automation
- Lack of a shared vision and roadmap for the future of our network and security architecture
Variation 2:
- Finger-pointing and blame games that undermine trust and collaboration
- Unhealthy competition for limited resources and recognition
- Fear of failure and risk aversion stifling experimentation and continuous improvement
- Lack of psychological safety and fear of speaking up about problems and challenges
I hope these variations give you plenty of options to choose from as you put together your response. Let me know if you need any other assistance!