diff --git a/personal/weight_loss.md b/personal/weight_loss.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1090c01
--- /dev/null
+++ b/personal/weight_loss.md
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+### **Best Option for Weight Loss and Cost-Effectiveness**
+
+1. **Mounjaro (tirzepatide)**
+   - **Effectiveness:** Up to 22.5% weight loss.
+   - **Cost:** Approximately $1,000 to $1,200 per month without insurance.
+   - **Insurance Coverage:** Potential for coverage, especially if prescribed for type 2 diabetes. Coverage for weight loss may require prior authorization.
+   - **Why Choose Mounjaro:** It offers the best balance between significant weight loss effectiveness and cost, particularly if insurance coverage is available.
+
+2. **Ozempic (semaglutide)**
+   - **Effectiveness:** 10-15% weight loss.
+   - **Cost:** Around $800 to $1,000 per month without insurance.
+   - **Insurance Coverage:** Widely covered for type 2 diabetes, with potential off-label use for weight loss. Lower copays and more consistent access.
+   - **Why Choose Ozempic:** The most cost-effective option with broader insurance coverage, though less effective for weight loss compared to Mounjaro and Zepbound.
+
+3. **Wegovy (semaglutide)**
+   - **Effectiveness:** Up to 17% weight loss.
+   - **Cost:** Roughly $1,300 to $1,500 per month without insurance.
+   - **Insurance Coverage:** Variable and often challenging to obtain for weight loss. Prior authorization may be required.
+   - **Why Choose Wegovy:** Effective for weight loss but may be difficult to obtain insurance coverage and tends to be more expensive.
+
+4. **Zepbound (retatrutide)**
+   - **Effectiveness:** Up to 24% weight loss.
+   - **Cost:** Estimated at $1,000 to $1,500 per month without insurance.
+   - **Insurance Coverage:** Limited, as it is a newer medication. Coverage may be more challenging to secure initially.
+   - **Why Choose Zepbound:** The most effective for weight loss but also the most expensive, with less established insurance coverage at this stage.
+
+### **Conclusion:**
+- **Insurance Coverage as a Priority:** **Ozempic** is likely the most accessible and cost-effective option if insurance coverage is a major concern, despite being slightly less effective for weight loss.
+- **Balancing Weight Loss and Cost:** **Mounjaro** is likely the best option if you can secure insurance coverage or manage out-of-pocket costs, offering a strong balance between weight loss effectiveness and cost.
+- **Maximal Weight Loss:** **Zepbound** may be worth considering if you are seeking the most significant weight loss and can afford the cost or have insurance that might cover it.
\ No newline at end of file