medusa/the_information_nexus
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update financial_docs/vwap_atr.md

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
medusa
2024-10-31 17:51:23 +00:00
parent 87c7df859c
commit 924c457cec
1 changed files with 222 additions and 43 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

265
financial_docs/vwap_atr.md
View File

@@ -1,55 +1,234 @@
# 2SD VWAP Trading System Let me analyze the potential biases we've introduced into the system.
## Core Components
```pine
//@version=5
indicator("2SD VWAP + ATR")
// Essential Elements
vwap = ta.vwap
stdev = ta.stdev(vwap, 15)
atr = ta.atr(14)
// Bands ```markdown
upper = vwap + 2 * stdev # VWAP Trading System Bias Analysis
lower = vwap - 2 * stdev
## Statistical Biases
1. Normal Distribution Assumption
```
Current Assumption:
- 2SD captures 95% of price movement
- Price returns to VWAP reliably
Reality Check:
- Markets aren't normally distributed
- Fat tails exist
- Black swan events occur
- VWAP reversion isn't guaranteed
``` ```
## Pattern Recognition 2. Sample Size Bias
1. Setup
- ES 15m chart primary
- BTC 15m chart secondary
- Alert when price hits 2SD
2. Trade Signal
- Price touches 2SD
- Rejection occurs
- No other conditions needed
## Position Sizing
``` ```
Position = Account Risk / ATR Current Assumption:
- 15-minute timeframe is optimal
- 15-period standard deviation is meaningful
Reality Check:
- Timeframe choice is arbitrary
- Period selection lacks statistical validation
- Different assets may require different parameters
``` ```
Simple. Volatility-adjusted. No bias.
## Trade Management 3. Look-Ahead Bias
1. Entry ```
- Pattern appears Current Assumption:
- Take position - Rejections are clearly identifiable
- Direction based on rejection - Pattern completion is obvious
2. Exit Reality Check:
- Pattern completes at VWAP - Real-time pattern recognition is harder
- Or pattern breaks - Clean rejections only visible after the fact
- Entry timing may vary
```
## Reality Check ## Behavioral Biases
- No time restrictions
- No complex conditions
- No perfect setups
- Pattern exists or doesn't
- ATR sizes position
- That's it
Raw Truth: Alert → Look → Size → Trade → Manage 1. Confirmation Bias
```
Current Implementation:
- Looking for "clean" moves to bands
- Seeking "clear" rejections
- Wanting "obvious" patterns
Everything else is noise. Risk:
- Overlooking valid setups that look messy
- Overoptimizing for perfect patterns
- Missing profitable but imperfect trades
```
2. Recency Bias
```
Current Implementation:
- Assuming recent pattern success continues
- Expecting consistent behavior
Risk:
- Market regimes change
- Pattern effectiveness varies
- Success rate fluctuates
```
3. Overconfidence Bias
```
Current Implementation:
- "Pattern exists or doesn't"
- Fixed position sizing
- Predetermined targets
Risk:
- Markets are probabilistic
- No pattern is 100% reliable
- Risk doesn't remain constant
```
## Suggested Bias Mitigations
1. Statistical Adjustments:
```python
def calculate_position_size(self, atr, account_risk):
# Add market regime consideration
volatility_factor = self.get_volatility_regime()
adjusted_risk = account_risk * volatility_factor
# Non-normal distribution adjustment
tail_risk_factor = self.calculate_tail_risk()
return adjusted_risk / (atr * tail_risk_factor)
```
2. Pattern Recognition Improvements:
```python
def validate_pattern(self, df):
# Add probabilistic scoring
pattern_score = 0
# Price action validation (70%)
if self.validate_price_action(df):
pattern_score += 70
# Volume confirmation (30%)
if self.validate_volume(df):
pattern_score += 30
# Return confidence level instead of binary
return pattern_score / 100
```
3. Risk Management Enhancements:
```python
def calculate_stop_distance(self, atr, pattern_quality):
# Dynamic stop based on pattern quality
base_stop = atr * 1.5
# Adjust for pattern clarity
if pattern_quality < 0.8: # Less clear pattern
return base_stop * 1.2 # Wider stop
return base_stop
```
## Revised Core Principles
1. Replace Absolute Statements:
- Old: "Pattern exists or doesn't"
- New: "Pattern shows varying degrees of quality"
2. Acknowledge Uncertainty:
- Old: "Exit at VWAP"
- New: "VWAP is probable, not certain, target"
3. Dynamic Position Sizing:
- Old: "Fixed risk/ATR"
- New: "Adjust size based on pattern quality and market conditions"
4. Pattern Recognition:
- Old: "Clear rejection signals reversal"
- New: "Rejection suggests probable reversal with varying strength"
## Implementation Changes Needed
1. Add Pattern Quality Scoring:
```
- Price action clarity (40%)
- Volume confirmation (30%)
- Market context (30%)
```
2. Dynamic Position Sizing:
```
Position = (Account Risk * Pattern Quality) / (ATR * Market Regime Factor)
```
3. Flexible Targets:
```
- Primary: VWAP (60% probability)
- Secondary: 50% retracement (30% probability)
- Extended: Full band return (10% probability)
```
4. Progressive Stops:
```
- Initial: Based on pattern structure
- Trail: Adjusted for volatility
- Time: Maximum hold period
```
## Action Items
1. Add Pattern Quality Metrics:
- Score each setup objectively
- Track success by score
- Adjust criteria based on results
2. Implement Regime Detection:
- Monitor volatility changes
- Track pattern effectiveness
- Adjust parameters dynamically
3. Improve Position Sizing:
- Consider pattern quality
- Account for market regime
- Include correlation factors
4. Enhance Risk Management:
- Dynamic stop placement
- Multiple exit strategies
- Time-based risk reduction
The goal is not to eliminate bias (impossible) but to acknowledge and account for it in system design and execution.
```
Key Recommendations:
1. Statistical Improvements:
- Add regime detection
- Implement dynamic sizing
- Consider non-normal distributions
2. Pattern Recognition:
- Use quality scoring
- Remove absolute statements
- Add probability framework
3. Risk Management:
- Dynamic stop placement
- Multiple exit strategies
- Pattern quality adjustments
4. System Adjustments:
- Replace absolute rules with probabilities
- Add quality metrics
- Implement flexible sizing
- Consider market regimes
Would you like me to:
1. Detail specific implementation changes?
2. Create a bias-adjusted strategy framework?
3. Develop quality scoring metrics?
4. Design regime detection logic?
The goal is to maintain system simplicity while acknowledging and accounting for inherent biases.