Update financial_docs/vwap_atr.md

2024-10-31 17:51:23 +00:00
parent 87c7df859c
commit 924c457cec
1 changed files with 222 additions and 43 deletions
--- a/financial_docs/vwap_atr.md
+++ b/financial_docs/vwap_atr.md
@@ -1,55 +1,234 @@
-# 2SD VWAP Trading System
+Let me analyze the potential biases we've introduced into the system.

-## Core Components
-```pine
-//@version=5
-indicator("2SD VWAP + ATR")

-// Essential Elements
-vwap = ta.vwap
-stdev = ta.stdev(vwap, 15)
-atr = ta.atr(14)

-// Bands
-upper = vwap + 2 * stdev
-lower = vwap - 2 * stdev
+```markdown
+# VWAP Trading System Bias Analysis
+
+## Statistical Biases
+
+1. Normal Distribution Assumption
+```
+Current Assumption:
+- 2SD captures 95% of price movement
+- Price returns to VWAP reliably
+
+Reality Check:
+- Markets aren't normally distributed
+- Fat tails exist
+- Black swan events occur
+- VWAP reversion isn't guaranteed
 ```

-## Pattern Recognition
-1. Setup
- ES 15m chart primary
- BTC 15m chart secondary
- Alert when price hits 2SD
-
-2. Trade Signal
- Price touches 2SD
- Rejection occurs
- No other conditions needed
-
-## Position Sizing
+2. Sample Size Bias
 ```
-Position = Account Risk / ATR
+Current Assumption:
+- 15-minute timeframe is optimal
+- 15-period standard deviation is meaningful
+
+Reality Check:
+- Timeframe choice is arbitrary
+- Period selection lacks statistical validation
+- Different assets may require different parameters
 ```
-Simple. Volatility-adjusted. No bias.

-## Trade Management
-1. Entry
- Pattern appears
- Take position
- Direction based on rejection
+3. Look-Ahead Bias
+```
+Current Assumption:
+- Rejections are clearly identifiable
+- Pattern completion is obvious

-2. Exit
- Pattern completes at VWAP
- Or pattern breaks
+Reality Check:
+- Real-time pattern recognition is harder
+- Clean rejections only visible after the fact
+- Entry timing may vary
+```

-## Reality Check
- No time restrictions
- No complex conditions
- No perfect setups
- Pattern exists or doesn't
- ATR sizes position
- That's it
+## Behavioral Biases

-Raw Truth: Alert → Look → Size → Trade → Manage
+1. Confirmation Bias
+```
+Current Implementation:
+- Looking for "clean" moves to bands
+- Seeking "clear" rejections
+- Wanting "obvious" patterns

-Everything else is noise.
+Risk:
+- Overlooking valid setups that look messy
+- Overoptimizing for perfect patterns
+- Missing profitable but imperfect trades
+```
+
+2. Recency Bias
+```
+Current Implementation:
+- Assuming recent pattern success continues
+- Expecting consistent behavior
+
+Risk:
+- Market regimes change
+- Pattern effectiveness varies
+- Success rate fluctuates
+```
+
+3. Overconfidence Bias
+```
+Current Implementation:
+- "Pattern exists or doesn't"
+- Fixed position sizing
+- Predetermined targets
+
+Risk:
+- Markets are probabilistic
+- No pattern is 100% reliable
+- Risk doesn't remain constant
+```
+
+## Suggested Bias Mitigations
+
+1. Statistical Adjustments:
+```python
+def calculate_position_size(self, atr, account_risk):
+    # Add market regime consideration
+    volatility_factor = self.get_volatility_regime()
+    adjusted_risk = account_risk * volatility_factor
+    
+    # Non-normal distribution adjustment
+    tail_risk_factor = self.calculate_tail_risk()
+    
+    return adjusted_risk / (atr * tail_risk_factor)
+```
+
+2. Pattern Recognition Improvements:
+```python
+def validate_pattern(self, df):
+    # Add probabilistic scoring
+    pattern_score = 0
+    
+    # Price action validation (70%)
+    if self.validate_price_action(df):
+        pattern_score += 70
+        
+    # Volume confirmation (30%)
+    if self.validate_volume(df):
+        pattern_score += 30
+    
+    # Return confidence level instead of binary
+    return pattern_score / 100
+```
+
+3. Risk Management Enhancements:
+```python
+def calculate_stop_distance(self, atr, pattern_quality):
+    # Dynamic stop based on pattern quality
+    base_stop = atr * 1.5
+    
+    # Adjust for pattern clarity
+    if pattern_quality < 0.8:  # Less clear pattern
+        return base_stop * 1.2  # Wider stop
+    
+    return base_stop
+```
+
+## Revised Core Principles
+
+1. Replace Absolute Statements:
+- Old: "Pattern exists or doesn't"
+- New: "Pattern shows varying degrees of quality"
+
+2. Acknowledge Uncertainty:
+- Old: "Exit at VWAP"
+- New: "VWAP is probable, not certain, target"
+
+3. Dynamic Position Sizing:
+- Old: "Fixed risk/ATR"
+- New: "Adjust size based on pattern quality and market conditions"
+
+4. Pattern Recognition:
+- Old: "Clear rejection signals reversal"
+- New: "Rejection suggests probable reversal with varying strength"
+
+## Implementation Changes Needed
+
+1. Add Pattern Quality Scoring:
+```
+- Price action clarity (40%)
+- Volume confirmation (30%)
+- Market context (30%)
+```
+
+2. Dynamic Position Sizing:
+```
+Position = (Account Risk * Pattern Quality) / (ATR * Market Regime Factor)
+```
+
+3. Flexible Targets:
+```
+- Primary: VWAP (60% probability)
+- Secondary: 50% retracement (30% probability)
+- Extended: Full band return (10% probability)
+```
+
+4. Progressive Stops:
+```
+- Initial: Based on pattern structure
+- Trail: Adjusted for volatility
+- Time: Maximum hold period
+```
+
+## Action Items
+
+1. Add Pattern Quality Metrics:
+   - Score each setup objectively
+   - Track success by score
+   - Adjust criteria based on results
+
+2. Implement Regime Detection:
+   - Monitor volatility changes
+   - Track pattern effectiveness
+   - Adjust parameters dynamically
+
+3. Improve Position Sizing:
+   - Consider pattern quality
+   - Account for market regime
+   - Include correlation factors
+
+4. Enhance Risk Management:
+   - Dynamic stop placement
+   - Multiple exit strategies
+   - Time-based risk reduction
+
+The goal is not to eliminate bias (impossible) but to acknowledge and account for it in system design and execution.
+
+```
+
+Key Recommendations:
+
+1. Statistical Improvements:
+- Add regime detection
+- Implement dynamic sizing
+- Consider non-normal distributions
+
+2. Pattern Recognition:
+- Use quality scoring
+- Remove absolute statements
+- Add probability framework
+
+3. Risk Management:
+- Dynamic stop placement
+- Multiple exit strategies
+- Pattern quality adjustments
+
+4. System Adjustments:
+- Replace absolute rules with probabilities
+- Add quality metrics
+- Implement flexible sizing
+- Consider market regimes
+
+Would you like me to:
+1. Detail specific implementation changes?
+2. Create a bias-adjusted strategy framework?
+3. Develop quality scoring metrics?
+4. Design regime detection logic?
+
+The goal is to maintain system simplicity while acknowledging and accounting for inherent biases.