Update financial_docs/vwap_atr.md

This commit is contained in:
2024-10-31 18:29:41 +00:00
parent 885297ca6b
commit a3a28debcf

View File

@@ -127,10 +127,6 @@ Removed:
- Detailed space checks - Detailed space checks
``` ```
Let me provide a bias-free, aligned version:
# 2SD VWAP Trading System Checklist # 2SD VWAP Trading System Checklist
## Setup Process ## Setup Process
@@ -217,3 +213,535 @@ Example:
--- ---
Note: This is a complete checklist. If pattern exists, trade. If not, wait. Note: This is a complete checklist. If pattern exists, trade. If not, wait.
---
# 2SD/3SD VWAP Trading System
Complete System Documentation
## I. System Overview
### Core Concept
A mechanical mean reversion system trading rejections from statistical deviation bands back to VWAP.
### Statistical Foundation
```
Price Distribution Zones:
- 2SD captures 95% of price movement
- 3SD captures 99.7% of price movement
- VWAP represents mean price path
```
## II. Technical Implementation
### Core Calculations
```pine
// VWAP and Standard Deviation
vwap = ta.vwap
stdev = ta.stdev(vwap, 15)
atr = ta.atr(14)
// Band Calculations
upper_2sd = vwap + 2 * stdev
lower_2sd = vwap - 2 * stdev
upper_3sd = vwap + 3 * stdev
lower_3sd = vwap - 3 * stdev
// Entry Conditions
long_2sd = low <= lower_2sd and close > lower_2sd
short_2sd = high >= upper_2sd and close < upper_2sd
long_3sd = low <= lower_3sd and close > lower_3sd
short_3sd = high >= upper_3sd and close < upper_3sd
```
### Alert Conditions
```pine
// Primary Alerts
alertcondition(long_2sd or short_2sd, "2SD Touch + Reject")
alertcondition(long_3sd or short_3sd, "3SD Touch + Reject")
// Alert Message Format
"{{ticker}} - Zone: {{band}} - ATR: {{atr}}"
```
## III. Trading Mechanics
### Position Sizing
```
2SD Trades:
Position = Risk ÷ ATR
3SD Trades:
Position = (Risk ÷ ATR) × 0.5
Example:
Risk = $100
ATR = $2.50
2SD Position = 40 units
3SD Position = 20 units
```
### Entry Rules
```
2SD Long:
- Price touches lower 2SD band
- Candle closes above band
- Enter next candle open
2SD Short:
- Price touches upper 2SD band
- Candle closes below band
- Enter next candle open
3SD Rules:
- Same entry mechanics
- Half position size
- Wider stops typical
```
### Stop Placement
```
All Trades:
- Behind rejection candle
- Account for volatility
- No adjustments after entry
```
### Target Selection
```
2SD Trades:
- Target = VWAP
- Exit on pattern break
3SD Trades:
- Primary Target = VWAP
- Secondary Target = 2SD band
- Exit on pattern break
```
## IV. Implementation Details
### Python Components
```python
class VWAPSystem:
def __init__(self):
self.lookback = 15
self.atr_period = 14
def calculate_bands(self, data):
# VWAP calculation
data['vwap'] = self.calculate_vwap(data)
# Standard deviation
data['stdev'] = data['vwap'].rolling(self.lookback).std()
# Band calculations
data['upper_2sd'] = data['vwap'] + 2 * data['stdev']
data['lower_2sd'] = data['vwap'] - 2 * data['stdev']
data['upper_3sd'] = data['vwap'] + 3 * data['stdev']
data['lower_3sd'] = data['vwap'] - 3 * data['stdev']
return data
def check_signals(self, data):
# Entry conditions
data['long_2sd'] = (data['low'] <= data['lower_2sd']) &
(data['close'] > data['lower_2sd'])
data['short_2sd'] = (data['high'] >= data['upper_2sd']) &
(data['close'] < data['upper_2sd'])
data['long_3sd'] = (data['low'] <= data['lower_3sd']) &
(data['close'] > data['lower_3sd'])
data['short_3sd'] = (data['high'] >= data['upper_3sd']) &
(data['close'] < data['upper_3sd'])
return data
```
### Pine Script Structure
```pine
//@version=5
indicator("2SD/3SD VWAP System")
// Core calculations
vwap = ta.vwap
stdev = ta.stdev(vwap, 15)
atr = ta.atr(14)
// Bands
var float[] bands = calculate_bands(vwap, stdev)
var float[] signals = check_signals(bands)
// Plotting
plot(vwap, "VWAP", color=color.blue)
plot(bands[0], "Upper 2SD", color=color.red)
plot(bands[1], "Lower 2SD", color=color.green)
```
## V. Process Flow
### Trading Session Flow
```
1. Setup Phase:
→ Load charts (ES 15min, BTC 15min)
→ Verify indicators
→ Activate alerts
2. Monitoring Phase:
→ Wait for alerts
→ Identify band touch
→ Confirm rejection
3. Execution Phase:
→ Calculate position size
→ Place entry order
→ Set stop loss
→ Set target
4. Management Phase:
→ Monitor for target hit
→ Watch for pattern break
→ Exit on either condition
```
### Decision Tree
```
Alert Received
Check Zone (2SD or 3SD)
Verify Rejection
Calculate Position
Execute Trade
Monitor to Exit
```
## VI. System Rules Summary
### Core Rules
1. Trade rejections only
2. Size by ATR
3. Enter after rejection
4. Exit at target or break
5. No exceptions
### Position Rules
1. 2SD = full size
2. 3SD = half size
3. No averaging
4. No scaling
### Exit Rules
1. Hit VWAP = win
2. Pattern breaks = exit
3. Stop hit = exit
4. No adjustments
## VII. Implementation Checklist
### Setup
- [ ] Install indicators
- [ ] Configure alerts
- [ ] Test calculations
- [ ] Verify data feed
### Trading
- [ ] Monitor alerts
- [ ] Check zone
- [ ] Calculate position
- [ ] Execute mechanically
- [ ] Record results
---
End of Documentation.
---
Let me create a React component version of the checklist that will render properly.
```tsx
import React from 'react';
import { Card, CardHeader, CardTitle, CardContent } from '@/components/ui/card';
const TradingChecklist = () => {
return (
<div className="max-w-4xl mx-auto space-y-6 p-6">
<Card className="border border-gray-200">
<CardHeader className="bg-gray-50 border-b border-gray-200">
<CardTitle className="text-lg font-semibold">2SD/3SD VWAP Trading System Checklist</CardTitle>
</CardHeader>
<CardContent className="p-4 space-y-6">
<div>
<h2 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-3">Pre-Session Setup</h2>
<div className="space-y-2">
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">TradingView Charts</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> ES1! 15-minute</li>
<li> BTC/USDT 15-minute</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">Indicators</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> VWAP (blue)</li>
<li> 2SD bands (red upper, green lower)</li>
<li> 3SD bands (visible)</li>
<li> ATR (14 period)</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">Alerts</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> 2SD touches</li>
<li> 3SD touches</li>
<li> Once per bar</li>
<li> ATR value included</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h2 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-3">Trading Process</h2>
<div className="space-y-4">
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">On Alert</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Identify zone hit (2SD or 3SD)</li>
<li> Verify rejection candle</li>
<li> Note current ATR</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">Position Sizing</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> 2SD: Risk ÷ ATR</li>
<li> 3SD: (Risk ÷ ATR) × 0.5</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h2 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-3">Pattern Reference</h2>
<div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4">
<div className="p-3 bg-green-50 rounded-lg">
<h3 className="font-medium text-green-700">2SD Long</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Price touches lower 2SD</li>
<li> Candle closes above band</li>
<li> Clear path to VWAP</li>
<li> Full position size</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div className="p-3 bg-red-50 rounded-lg">
<h3 className="font-medium text-red-700">2SD Short</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Price touches upper 2SD</li>
<li> Candle closes below band</li>
<li> Clear path to VWAP</li>
<li> Full position size</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div className="p-3 bg-green-50 rounded-lg">
<h3 className="font-medium text-green-700">3SD Long</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Price touches lower 3SD</li>
<li> Candle closes above band</li>
<li> Path to VWAP/2SD clear</li>
<li> Half position size</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div className="p-3 bg-red-50 rounded-lg">
<h3 className="font-medium text-red-700">3SD Short</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Price touches upper 3SD</li>
<li> Candle closes below band</li>
<li> Path to VWAP/2SD clear</li>
<li> Half position size</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h2 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-3">Exit Rules</h2>
<div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4">
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">2SD Trades</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Hit VWAP = Take profit</li>
<li> Pattern breaks = Exit</li>
<li> Stop hit = Exit</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>
<h3 className="font-medium">3SD Trades</h3>
<ul className="ml-4 space-y-1">
<li> Hit VWAP/2SD = Take profit</li>
<li> Pattern breaks = Exit</li>
<li> Stop hit = Exit</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div className="p-4 bg-gray-50 rounded-lg">
<h2 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-3">Key Reminders</h2>
<ul className="space-y-1">
<li> No additional filters</li>
<li> No timeframe restrictions</li>
<li> No extra indicators</li>
<li> Pattern exists or doesn't</li>
<li> Next setup always comes</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div className="text-center font-medium">
Alert Pattern Size Trade Exit
<div className="mt-2 text-gray-600">Everything else is noise.</div>
</div>
</CardContent>
</Card>
</div>
);
};
export default TradingChecklist;
```
---
The half position size at 3SD is based on statistical principles and risk management, but let me analyze this in detail.
# 3SD Position Size Analysis
## Statistical Context
```
Price Distribution:
2SD = 95% of moves (1 in 20 events)
3SD = 99.7% of moves (1 in 370 events)
Current Rule:
2SD = Full size (Risk/ATR)
3SD = Half size (Risk/ATR × 0.5)
```
## Examining The Logic
### Arguments FOR Half Size
1. Volatility Consideration
- 3SD moves indicate higher volatility
- May need wider stops
- Higher ATR during these moves
2. Statistical Rarity
- Much rarer events
- Less historical precedent
- Harder to validate pattern
3. Risk of Continuation
- Strong momentum to reach 3SD
- Could signal trend change
- Higher probability of continuation
### Arguments AGAINST Half Size
1. Violates System Mechanics
- Adds complexity
- Introduces discretion
- Breaks ATR sizing logic
2. Statistical Edge
- Stronger mean reversion potential
- Clearer extreme condition
- More defined edge
3. ATR Already Adjusts
- Higher volatility = Higher ATR
- Position size naturally reduces
- Built-in risk management
## Position Sizing Reality
```
Example with $100 Risk:
Normal Market:
ATR = $2.50
2SD Position = $100/$2.50 = 40 units
3SD Position = $100/$2.50 × 0.5 = 20 units
High Volatility Market:
ATR = $5.00
2SD Position = $100/$5.00 = 20 units
3SD Position = $100/$5.00 × 0.5 = 10 units
BUT: ATR is likely already higher at 3SD!
If ATR = $5.00 at 3SD naturally:
Position = $100/$5.00 = 20 units
(Natural reduction without arbitrary halving)
```
## Recommendation
### Remove Half-Size Rule
```
New Rule: Position = Risk ÷ ATR
Reasoning:
1. ATR captures volatility
2. Keeps system mechanical
3. Removes complexity
4. Maintains consistency
```
### Updated Position Logic
```
ALL Trades (2SD and 3SD):
1. Note current ATR
2. Calculate Position = Risk ÷ ATR
3. Place trade
4. No additional adjustments
```
## Key Points
1. ATR naturally adapts to volatility
2. System should remain mechanical
3. Arbitrary adjustments add bias
4. Consistency breeds confidence
## Conclusion
The half-size rule at 3SD appears to be:
1. Redundant (ATR already adjusts)
2. Adds complexity
3. Breaks mechanical nature
4. Introduces bias
Recommendation: Remove the half-size rule and maintain pure ATR-based sizing for all trades.
---
Remember: The best trading system is one you can execute consistently. Adding rules needs strong justification.
After this analysis, I believe we should:
1. Remove the half-size rule
2. Let ATR handle volatility naturally
3. Maintain system simplicity
4. Keep position sizing mechanical
Would you like me to:
1. Update the system documentation?
2. Provide example calculations?
3. Add risk analysis metrics?
4. Detail volatility adjustments?
The goal is to keep the system purely mechanical while letting the ATR handle position sizing naturally.