From c7262c33e2484f454ff1dea9edce904bac205248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: medusa Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 05:36:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md --- tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md b/tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md index 26f321c..58c6f06 100644 --- a/tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md +++ b/tech_docs/jinja2_framework.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ What we are really looking at is two different answers to the same meta-question > “How much of the host language’s power do we allow to leak into a string that is *mostly* meant to be static markup?” Everything else—syntax, loops, auto-escaping—are just surface symptoms of that deeper design choice. - +```plaintext ────────────────────────────────────── 1. Language Leakage Spectrum ────────────────────────────────────── @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Imagine you have to hand your templates to a junior front-end contractor tomorro • With Jinja2 you will hand them a loaded gun and a safety manual. • With Go templates you will hand them a paintbrush and a locked-down palette. - +``` That single difference is the *meta* comparison. ---