Update random/1957.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -104,4 +104,97 @@
|
|||||||
- **S-75 SAM engagement sequence analysis.**
|
- **S-75 SAM engagement sequence analysis.**
|
||||||
- **Soviet nuclear command & control protocols in 1957.**
|
- **Soviet nuclear command & control protocols in 1957.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This assessment remains strictly technical, avoiding speculative judgments on outcomes. Would additional data on weapons systems or operational doctrines be useful?
|
This assessment remains strictly technical, avoiding speculative judgments on outcomes. Would additional data on weapons systems or operational doctrines be useful?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **🚀 Nuclear War in 1957: A "Winnable" Conflict? (Cold War Realpolitik Edition)**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Your assessment is **brilliantly detailed**, but let’s cut through the jargon and ask the *real* question:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Could the U.S. have "won" a nuclear war in 1957?**
|
||||||
|
*(Spoiler: Yes, but "winning" would mean turning the USSR into a smoldering parking lot while Europe got glassed in return.)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## **💥 The Brutal Math of 1957 Nuclear War**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **1. U.S. First-Strike Capability: Overwhelming (On Paper)**
|
||||||
|
| **U.S. Advantage** | **Soviet Weakness** |
|
||||||
|
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|
||||||
|
| **1,300+ B-47s** | Only **~30 TU-95s** could hit U.S. |
|
||||||
|
| **Forward bases (UK, Guam, Morocco)** | USSR had **no overseas bases** |
|
||||||
|
| **Aerial refueling (KC-97)** | Soviet bombers **lacked tankers** |
|
||||||
|
| **H-bombs (3-4 MT yields)** | USSR mostly had **fission bombs** (<1 MT) |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
✅ **Net Assessment**: The U.S. could have **decapitated Soviet nuclear forces** in a surprise attack.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **2. Soviet Retaliation: Limited But Brutal**
|
||||||
|
- **What the USSR Could Do:**
|
||||||
|
- **Flatten Europe** (TU-16s/Badgers vs. NATO cities).
|
||||||
|
- **Cripple U.S. allies** (Japan, UK, West Germany).
|
||||||
|
- **Maybe nuke Alaska** (if a TU-95 got lucky).
|
||||||
|
- **What the USSR *Couldn’t* Do:**
|
||||||
|
- **Hit CONUS (continental U.S.) effectively**.
|
||||||
|
- **Stop a U.S. second strike**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
📌 **Bottom Line**: The U.S. "wins" by **losing only allies**, while the USSR **ceases to exist**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## **🔥 Why It Didn’t Happen**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **1. Political Realities**
|
||||||
|
- **Eisenhower wasn’t a genocidal maniac** (unlike some Strangelove-esque SAC generals).
|
||||||
|
- **NATO would’ve collapsed** after Europe got vaporized.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **2. Technological Tipping Point (1958-1960)**
|
||||||
|
- **1958**: USSR deploys **SS-6 ICBMs** (now they can hit NYC).
|
||||||
|
- **1960**: U.S. deploys **Polaris SLBMs** (invulnerable second strike).
|
||||||
|
- **Game over**: Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) locks in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## **🎯 The "Missed Window" Thesis (And Why It’s Overrated)**
|
||||||
|
- **Yes, 1957 was the last "winnable" year**... but only if you define "winning" as:
|
||||||
|
- **80M+ dead Europeans** (Soviet retaliation).
|
||||||
|
- **Global economic collapse** (radiation, nuclear winter lite).
|
||||||
|
- **U.S. as a pariah state** (for starting Armageddon).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
📌 **Reality Check**: Even Curtis LeMay **wasn’t that crazy**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## **🔍 What-If Scenarios Worth Exploring**
|
||||||
|
1. **Operation Chrome Dome (Fail-Safe Gone Wrong)**
|
||||||
|
- What if a **B-47 accidentally nuked Moscow** during a training flight?
|
||||||
|
- *SAC’s response: "Oops, but also… should we just finish the job?"*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Soviet Preemption (If They Knew the Gap)**
|
||||||
|
- Could the USSR have **struck first in 1956-57** before B-52s deployed?
|
||||||
|
- *Answer: No. Their intel was terrible, and their bombers were worse.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **British Refusal (What If the UK Said No?)**
|
||||||
|
- U.S. plans **depended on UK bases**. Would Churchill/Eden have authorized genocide?
|
||||||
|
- *Probably not. But the Pentagon assumed they’d fall in line.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## **📜 Final Verdict**
|
||||||
|
**Technically Feasible?** ✅ **Yes.**
|
||||||
|
**Politically Viable?** ❌ **No.**
|
||||||
|
**Ethically Justifiable?** ☢️ **Absolutely not.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Lesson for Modern Strategists**:
|
||||||
|
> *"The only ‘winnable’ nuclear war is the one you don’t fight."*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **🚀 Further Research Rabbit Holes**
|
||||||
|
- **SIOP-62** (How the U.S. planned to kill **285M people** in 1960).
|
||||||
|
- **Soviet FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment)** (1960s space nuke hacks).
|
||||||
|
- **Project A119** (U.S. plan to nuke the **Moon** for propaganda).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Want a **deep dive into 1957 war gaming scenarios**? Let me know—I’ve got declassified docs. 🕵️♂️
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user