Update smma/grant_starting.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,3 +1,69 @@
|
|||||||
|
Perfect. Design the full pipeline architecture but keep the logic layer completely pluggable. Here's the end-to-end structure:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Data Flow Architecture:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Raw Ingestion → Staging → Normalization → Enrichment Engine → Production → API
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Core Tables (Raw → Normalized):**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```sql
|
||||||
|
-- Raw ingestion (exactly as received)
|
||||||
|
raw_grants_xml
|
||||||
|
raw_usaspending_csv
|
||||||
|
raw_sam_opportunities
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Normalized (clean, standardized)
|
||||||
|
opportunities (id, title, agency, amount, deadline, description, source)
|
||||||
|
awards (id, recipient, amount, date, agency, type)
|
||||||
|
agencies (code, name, type, parent_agency)
|
||||||
|
recipients (id, name, type, location)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- Enrichment (computed values)
|
||||||
|
opportunity_metrics (opportunity_id, days_to_deadline, competition_score, etc.)
|
||||||
|
agency_patterns (agency_id, avg_award_amount, funding_cycles, etc.)
|
||||||
|
recipient_history (recipient_id, win_rate, avg_award, specialties, etc.)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Enrichment Engine Interface:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
class EnrichmentProcessor:
|
||||||
|
def process_opportunity(self, opportunity_id):
|
||||||
|
# Pluggable enrichment modules
|
||||||
|
pass
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def process_award(self, award_id):
|
||||||
|
pass
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def process_batch(self, batch_type, date_range):
|
||||||
|
pass
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Pipeline Orchestration:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
1. Raw Data Collectors (per source)
|
||||||
|
2. Data Validators (schema compliance)
|
||||||
|
3. Normalizers (clean → standard format)
|
||||||
|
4. Enrichment Processors (pluggable logic modules)
|
||||||
|
5. API Cache Invalidation
|
||||||
|
6. Quality Checks & Alerts
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Abstracted Logic Layer:**
|
||||||
|
- All business logic lives in separate modules
|
||||||
|
- Core pipeline just moves data through stages
|
||||||
|
- Easy to A/B test different enrichment strategies
|
||||||
|
- Can turn enrichments on/off per client
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**The beauty:** You build the plumbing once, then can rapidly iterate on the enrichment logic without touching the core ETL.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Want me to flesh out the raw data ingestion layer first, or the enrichment engine interface?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Yes, absolutely! The information you just provided from USAspending.gov is **extremely valuable and directly relevant** to what you're trying to achieve, especially if your long-term goal is to provide comprehensive government funding intelligence (grants AND contracts).
|
Yes, absolutely! The information you just provided from USAspending.gov is **extremely valuable and directly relevant** to what you're trying to achieve, especially if your long-term goal is to provide comprehensive government funding intelligence (grants AND contracts).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here's why this is worthwhile and how it fits into your plan:
|
Here's why this is worthwhile and how it fits into your plan:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user