diff --git a/personal/the_condemned_switch.md b/personal/the_condemned_switch.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8aca730
--- /dev/null
+++ b/personal/the_condemned_switch.md
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+### **The Condemned Switch: A Trolley Problem of Action, Perception & Moral Sacrifice**  
+
+#### **The Scenario:**  
+A runaway trolley is heading toward twin infant girls (3 months old, healthy, with loving families and bright futures). If you do nothing, they will die.  
+
+You stand next to a switch that can divert the trolley onto a side track—but this will kill an orphan suffering from **treatment-resistant depression** and **trigeminal neuralgia** (a life of chronic, excruciating pain).  
+
+**You must choose:**  
+- **Do nothing** → The twins die.  
+- **Pull the switch** → The orphan dies, but the twins survive.  
+
+#### **The Twist: You Are Convicted of Murder**  
+An unseen observer witnesses you pull the switch—but **does not see the twins on the main track**. To them, it appears you deliberately diverted the trolley to kill an innocent person.  
+
+- You are arrested, tried, and **convicted of premeditated murder**.  
+- The court rules that no "reasonable person" would pull the switch without malicious intent.  
+- There is **no evidence** of the twins ever being in danger—your explanation sounds like a deranged justification.  
+- Society universally condemns you as a **monster**.  
+
+#### **The Core Dilemma:**  
+1. **Does the morally "correct" choice change if the world will forever believe you are evil?**  
+2. **Is it worth saving two lives if you must bear the punishment meant for a murderer?**  
+3. **Can justice exist when truth is invisible?**  
+
+---
+
+### **Key Philosophical Tensions**  
+✅ **Utilitarianism vs. Deontology**  
+- *Utilitarian*: Pulling the switch saves more lives (2 > 1).  
+- *Deontological*: Actively causing death is murder, regardless of intent.  
+
+✅ **Moral Luck & The Problem of Perception**  
+- Your fate hinges not on your choice, but on **what others can perceive**.  
+- Parallels real-world cases where whistleblowers or heroes are punished because their full context is unseen.  
+
+✅ **The "Reasonable Person" Fallacy**  
+- The law assumes a rational actor wouldn’t pull the switch—but **what if the rational choice requires hidden knowledge?**  
+
+✅ **The Cost of Moral Courage**  
+- Would you still act if the reward for doing good is **eternal infamy**?  
+
+---
+
+### **Refined Thought Experiment Prompts:**  
+1. **If you knew pulling the switch would ruin your life, would you still do it?**  
+2. **Does morality require martyrdom?**  
+3. **Can an action be "right" if everyone believes it’s wrong?**  
+4. **Should the law account for unprovable moral justifications?**
\ No newline at end of file