Update random/simple_systems.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -239,3 +239,102 @@ cue vet schema.cue config.cue -d "#Theme"
|
|||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
These examples should help you apply your system thinking approach to various domains effectively.
|
These examples should help you apply your system thinking approach to various domains effectively.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here's the **zeroed-in logic** distilled to its essence, framed as a rigorous validation system:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Core Validation Logic (CUE Lattice Perspective)**
|
||||||
|
1. **Prime Constraint**
|
||||||
|
All configurations must unify with:
|
||||||
|
```cue
|
||||||
|
#Theme: {
|
||||||
|
name: "space" | "biology" | "music" // Closed set of themes
|
||||||
|
subdomains: [...{
|
||||||
|
name: or(#TermRegistry[name][*]) // Must match theme's term registry
|
||||||
|
purpose: string
|
||||||
|
}]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Term Registry**
|
||||||
|
Theme-specific allowed terms (immutable):
|
||||||
|
```cue
|
||||||
|
#TermRegistry: {
|
||||||
|
space: ["apollo", "europa", "hubble"]
|
||||||
|
biology: ["synapse", "xylem", "neuron"]
|
||||||
|
music: ["cadence", "forte", "allegro"]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Validation Outcomes**
|
||||||
|
- **Valid (`&`):**
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
theme: "space"
|
||||||
|
subdomains: [{name: "apollo"}] // Unifies with #Theme
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
- **Invalid (`⊥`):**
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
theme: "space"
|
||||||
|
subdomains: [{name: "synapse"}] // Fails (biology term in space)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
- **Alternative Valid (`|`):**
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
theme: "biology" // Switches context
|
||||||
|
subdomains: [{name: "synapse"}] // Now valid
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Visual Workflow (Minimal)**
|
||||||
|
```mermaid
|
||||||
|
graph LR
|
||||||
|
A[User Input] --> B{Unify with #Theme?}
|
||||||
|
B -->|Yes| C[Valid Output]
|
||||||
|
B -->|No| D[⊥ Invalid]
|
||||||
|
A --> E{Try Disjunction?}
|
||||||
|
E -->|Alternative Theme| C
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Why This Works**
|
||||||
|
1. **Closed-World Assumption:**
|
||||||
|
- Only explicitly listed themes/terms are valid.
|
||||||
|
- No "mixing" possible (e.g., `synapse` will never unify with `space`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Lattice Properties:**
|
||||||
|
- **Top (⊤):** All possible inputs.
|
||||||
|
- **Bottom (⊥):** Invalid configurations (explicitly rejected).
|
||||||
|
- **Unification (`&`):** Strict theme-term matching.
|
||||||
|
- **Disjunction (`|`):** Theme-switching as only alternative path.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Prime Silence:**
|
||||||
|
- No extraneous constraints (e.g., zones, auth) at this stage.
|
||||||
|
- Focus solely on term-theme alignment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Implementation (3-Step Process)**
|
||||||
|
1. **Define:**
|
||||||
|
```cue
|
||||||
|
#Theme: {...} // As above
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
2. **Validate:**
|
||||||
|
```bash
|
||||||
|
cue vet schema.cue config.yml -d "#Theme"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
3. **Act:**
|
||||||
|
- If valid → deploy.
|
||||||
|
- If ⊥ → reject or switch theme (`|`).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This captures the **irreducible core** of your system:
|
||||||
|
- **What matters:** Theme-term alignment.
|
||||||
|
- **What doesn't:** Everything else (for now).
|
||||||
|
- **Guarantee:** No cross-theme contamination.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Would you like the equivalent JSON Schema or a minimal CUE validator script?
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user