Update bounded_chaos.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,3 +1,78 @@
|
|||||||
|
The choice of Lean/Coq in Bounded Chaos (BC) represents a deliberate first-principles decision, but the framework maintains tooling-agnostic foundations. Here's the formal stance:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Tooling Philosophy in BC**
|
||||||
|
1. **Core Requirements** (Immutable):
|
||||||
|
- Formal verification of:
|
||||||
|
- `φ-Criticality` (geometric scaling proofs)
|
||||||
|
- `𝓕-Completeness` (combinatorial bounds)
|
||||||
|
- Cryptographic artifact binding (SHA-256)
|
||||||
|
- Hardware attestation of ε-bounds (TPM)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Current Tooling** (Replaceable with Equivalents):
|
||||||
|
| Tool | Role | Replaceable With | Conditions |
|
||||||
|
|------|------|------------------|------------|
|
||||||
|
| Lean | 𝓕-Completeness proofs | Agda, Isabelle | Must support: <br> • Dependent types <br> • Termination proofs |
|
||||||
|
| Coq | φ-Criticality proofs | HOL4, Metamath | Must verify: <br> • Irrational scaling <br> • Geometric series bounds |
|
||||||
|
| CUE | Axiom schema validation | JSON Schema + Z3 | Must enforce: <br> • Hash-locking <br> • Patent-axiom mappings |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **Concrete Upgrade Path**:
|
||||||
|
```mermaid
|
||||||
|
graph TB
|
||||||
|
A[BC Core] --> B{Verification Method}
|
||||||
|
B -->|Current| C[Lean/Coq]
|
||||||
|
B -->|Quantum-era| D[ZKP-based provers]
|
||||||
|
B -->|Biological| E[DNA proof storage]
|
||||||
|
C & D & E --> F[Common Requirements]
|
||||||
|
F --> G((φ-scaling))
|
||||||
|
F --> H((ΔS≤ε))
|
||||||
|
F --> I((U₁₆ ancestry))
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Transition Conditions**
|
||||||
|
For any replacement toolchain to be BC-compliant, it must:
|
||||||
|
1. **Preserve the 6 axioms** exactly as formulated
|
||||||
|
2. **Maintain the cryptographic manifest** structure:
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"proofs": {
|
||||||
|
"φ-criticality": {"tool": "Coq|HOL4|...", "hash": "sha256:..."},
|
||||||
|
"𝓕-completeness": {"tool": "Lean|Agda|...", "hash": "sha256:..."}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
3. **Demonstrate equivalence** by:
|
||||||
|
- Cross-compiling existing Lean/Coq proofs
|
||||||
|
- Showing identical artifact hashes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Example Transition**
|
||||||
|
To replace Lean with Agda:
|
||||||
|
1. Write Agda equivalent of:
|
||||||
|
```lean
|
||||||
|
theorem fib_bound (S: State) : ∃ n, |S| ≤ Fib(n+2) := ...
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
2. Generate matching artifact hash
|
||||||
|
3. Update CUE validator:
|
||||||
|
```cue
|
||||||
|
#VerificationMethod: "Agda" | "Lean"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### **Biological/Quantum Future-Proofing**
|
||||||
|
1. **DNA Storage**:
|
||||||
|
- BC manifests can encode in DNA if:
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
encode_dna(sha256(proof)) == decode_dna(dna_artifact)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
2. **ZKP Provers**:
|
||||||
|
- Must verify φ-scaling with ≤11 steps (K11-bound)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This maintains BC's first-principles while allowing tool evolution. The axioms remain constant; only their mechanical verification may upgrade.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
[STATUS: TOOLING-AGNOSTIC AXIOMATIC CORE PRESERVED]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Would you like the formal equivalence proof template between Lean/Coq and alternate provers?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here's the distilled **Bounded Chaos (BC) Framework** documentation focused purely on first principles, integrating the IP Singularity insights:
|
Here's the distilled **Bounded Chaos (BC) Framework** documentation focused purely on first principles, integrating the IP Singularity insights:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### **Bounded Chaos (BC) First-Principles Specification**
|
### **Bounded Chaos (BC) First-Principles Specification**
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user