Update bounded_chaos.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,3 +1,78 @@
|
||||
The choice of Lean/Coq in Bounded Chaos (BC) represents a deliberate first-principles decision, but the framework maintains tooling-agnostic foundations. Here's the formal stance:
|
||||
|
||||
### **Tooling Philosophy in BC**
|
||||
1. **Core Requirements** (Immutable):
|
||||
- Formal verification of:
|
||||
- `φ-Criticality` (geometric scaling proofs)
|
||||
- `𝓕-Completeness` (combinatorial bounds)
|
||||
- Cryptographic artifact binding (SHA-256)
|
||||
- Hardware attestation of ε-bounds (TPM)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Current Tooling** (Replaceable with Equivalents):
|
||||
| Tool | Role | Replaceable With | Conditions |
|
||||
|------|------|------------------|------------|
|
||||
| Lean | 𝓕-Completeness proofs | Agda, Isabelle | Must support: <br> • Dependent types <br> • Termination proofs |
|
||||
| Coq | φ-Criticality proofs | HOL4, Metamath | Must verify: <br> • Irrational scaling <br> • Geometric series bounds |
|
||||
| CUE | Axiom schema validation | JSON Schema + Z3 | Must enforce: <br> • Hash-locking <br> • Patent-axiom mappings |
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Concrete Upgrade Path**:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TB
|
||||
A[BC Core] --> B{Verification Method}
|
||||
B -->|Current| C[Lean/Coq]
|
||||
B -->|Quantum-era| D[ZKP-based provers]
|
||||
B -->|Biological| E[DNA proof storage]
|
||||
C & D & E --> F[Common Requirements]
|
||||
F --> G((φ-scaling))
|
||||
F --> H((ΔS≤ε))
|
||||
F --> I((U₁₆ ancestry))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### **Transition Conditions**
|
||||
For any replacement toolchain to be BC-compliant, it must:
|
||||
1. **Preserve the 6 axioms** exactly as formulated
|
||||
2. **Maintain the cryptographic manifest** structure:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"proofs": {
|
||||
"φ-criticality": {"tool": "Coq|HOL4|...", "hash": "sha256:..."},
|
||||
"𝓕-completeness": {"tool": "Lean|Agda|...", "hash": "sha256:..."}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
3. **Demonstrate equivalence** by:
|
||||
- Cross-compiling existing Lean/Coq proofs
|
||||
- Showing identical artifact hashes
|
||||
|
||||
### **Example Transition**
|
||||
To replace Lean with Agda:
|
||||
1. Write Agda equivalent of:
|
||||
```lean
|
||||
theorem fib_bound (S: State) : ∃ n, |S| ≤ Fib(n+2) := ...
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. Generate matching artifact hash
|
||||
3. Update CUE validator:
|
||||
```cue
|
||||
#VerificationMethod: "Agda" | "Lean"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### **Biological/Quantum Future-Proofing**
|
||||
1. **DNA Storage**:
|
||||
- BC manifests can encode in DNA if:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
encode_dna(sha256(proof)) == decode_dna(dna_artifact)
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. **ZKP Provers**:
|
||||
- Must verify φ-scaling with ≤11 steps (K11-bound)
|
||||
|
||||
This maintains BC's first-principles while allowing tool evolution. The axioms remain constant; only their mechanical verification may upgrade.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[STATUS: TOOLING-AGNOSTIC AXIOMATIC CORE PRESERVED]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like the formal equivalence proof template between Lean/Coq and alternate provers?
|
||||
|
||||
Here's the distilled **Bounded Chaos (BC) Framework** documentation focused purely on first principles, integrating the IP Singularity insights:
|
||||
|
||||
### **Bounded Chaos (BC) First-Principles Specification**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user