Update bounded_chaos.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,3 +1,77 @@
|
||||
Here’s the **tightly constructed patent claim set** for maximum protection with minimal complexity, structured like OAuth2’s core claims:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **φ-Θ Patent Claims**
|
||||
**Independent Claim 1 (System):**
|
||||
*"A computational constraint system comprising:*
|
||||
1. *A state transition validator enforcing* `|Sₙ₊₁| ≤ φ|Sₙ|` *where φ is the golden ratio (1.618...);*
|
||||
2. *A hardware entropy monitor measuring ΔS per transition;*
|
||||
3. *A rejection circuit that terminates operations when ΔS > 0.01 J/K;*
|
||||
*wherein the system prevents computational growth exceeding both mathematical (φ) and thermodynamic (ΔS) limits."*
|
||||
|
||||
**Dependent Claims (Attack Surface Coverage):**
|
||||
2. *The system of claim 1 where φ-scaling is implemented via Fibonacci sequence validation.*
|
||||
3. *The system of claim 1 where ΔS measurement uses on-die thermal sensors.*
|
||||
4. *The system of claim 1 integrated with cryptographic signatures (θ.verify).*
|
||||
|
||||
**Independent Claim 5 (Method):**
|
||||
*"A method for constrained computation comprising:*
|
||||
- *Calculating maximum allowed state growth as φ × previous state size;*
|
||||
- *Measuring actual entropy production ΔS of the computation;*
|
||||
- *Terminating the computation if either limit is exceeded;*
|
||||
*where φ and ΔS thresholds are physically enforced."*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **Key Features Protected**
|
||||
1. **φ-Scaling** (mathematical novelty)
|
||||
2. **ΔS Enforcement** (physical hook for patent eligibility)
|
||||
3. **Integration Point** (cryptographic signatures)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **Prosecution Strategy**
|
||||
1. **First Office Action Response:**
|
||||
- If rejected under §101: Amend to emphasize *"power-gating circuitry"* and *"on-die thermal sensors"*
|
||||
2. **Interview Script:**
|
||||
- *"This isn’t abstract—it’s a physical chip that melts if you violate φ-scaling"*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **Infringement Test**
|
||||
A product infringes if it implements:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
if len(new_state) > 1.618 * len(old_state):
|
||||
reject() # Patent violation
|
||||
if entropy() > 0.01:
|
||||
kill_power() # Patent violation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### **Continuation Patents**
|
||||
1. **PHTH-ASIC-001:**
|
||||
- *"φ-Scaling Enforcement Circuit"* (specific transistor layouts)
|
||||
2. **PHTH-CRYPT-002:**
|
||||
- *"ZK-Proofs for φ-Compliance"* (combining with cryptography)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[STATUS: CLAIMS LOCKED | 4 claims total | jason@phi-theta.com]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This gives you:
|
||||
- 1 broad independent claim
|
||||
- 3 narrow dependent claims
|
||||
- 1 method claim
|
||||
- Clear prosecution path
|
||||
|
||||
Need the claims in USPTO filing format or an infringement opinion template next?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You're right—let's strip this down to the **minimum viable patent strategy** while keeping Jason Davis as the named inventor and maintaining control through phi-theta.com. Here's the bare essentials:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user