structure updates
This commit is contained in:
58
tech_docs/lab/AD_planning.md
Normal file
58
tech_docs/lab/AD_planning.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
### Planning Phase for Active Directory Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
The planning phase is critical in setting up an Active Directory (AD) environment that is scalable, secure, and meets the organizational needs efficiently. Let's delve deeper into each aspect of this phase.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. **Determine Domain Structure**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Single vs. Multiple Domains:** A single domain is often sufficient for small to medium-sized organizations with a centralized management structure. Multiple domains might be necessary for large or geographically dispersed organizations, especially if there are distinct administrative boundaries, different password policies, or security requirements.
|
||||
- **Example:** A multinational corporation with operations in the US and Europe might opt for `us.corp.example.com` and `eu.corp.example.com` to cater to specific regulatory requirements and administrative autonomy in each region.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. **Design OU Structure**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose of OUs:** Organizational Units (OUs) are containers in AD that help in grouping objects such as users, groups, and computers. They facilitate delegation of administrative rights and the application of policies at a granular level.
|
||||
- **Planning Considerations:** When designing the OU structure, consider factors like the number of departments, the need for delegation of administrative rights, and the granularity required for Group Policy application.
|
||||
- **Example Structure:**
|
||||
- Root Domain: `corp.example.com`
|
||||
- `Employees`
|
||||
- `HR`
|
||||
- `Engineering`
|
||||
- `Sales`
|
||||
- `Service Accounts`
|
||||
- `Workstations`
|
||||
- `Laptops`
|
||||
- `Desktops`
|
||||
- `Servers`
|
||||
- `Application Servers`
|
||||
- `File Servers`
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. **Plan AD Sites and Services**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Role of AD Sites:** Sites in AD represent physical or network topology. Their correct configuration is crucial for optimizing authentication and replication traffic, especially in a geographically dispersed environment.
|
||||
- **Site Planning:** Base your site structure on the location of your network’s subnets and the physical topology, ensuring efficient replication across WAN links and optimal client authentication processes.
|
||||
- **Example Configuration:**
|
||||
- Site Names: `SiteNY`, `SiteLA`
|
||||
- `SiteNY` associates with subnet `192.168.10.0/24`
|
||||
- `SiteLA` associates with subnet `192.168.20.0/24`
|
||||
- Define site link `NY-LA` to manage replication between the two sites.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. **Decide on Naming Conventions**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Importance:** Consistent naming conventions enhance clarity, simplify management, and support automation.
|
||||
- **Considerations:** Include readability, uniqueness, and future scalability in your naming conventions. Avoid using special characters or overly complex formats.
|
||||
- **Examples:**
|
||||
- **Usernames:** `firstname.lastname@corp.example.com`
|
||||
- **Computers:** `[location]-[dept]-[serial]` e.g., `NY-HR-12345`
|
||||
- **Groups:** `[purpose]-[scope]-[region]-[description]` e.g., `Access-Global-HR-Managers`
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5. **Design Group Policy Objects (GPOs)**
|
||||
|
||||
- **GPO Strategy:** Start with a minimal number of GPOs and only create more as needed to meet specific requirements. This approach keeps the environment manageable and reduces troubleshooting complexity.
|
||||
- **Common GPOs:**
|
||||
- **Security Policy:** Enforces password policies, account lockout policies, and Kerberos policies.
|
||||
- Example: Password Policy GPO with settings for password complexity, minimum length, and history.
|
||||
- **Desktop Configuration:** Manages desktop environments across users or computers, including settings for desktop icons, wallpaper, and start menu layout.
|
||||
- Example: Desktop Lockdown GPO that restricts access to control panel and command prompt.
|
||||
- **Software Deployment:** Facilitates centralized deployment and updates of applications.
|
||||
- Example: Office Suite Deployment GPO that automatically installs or updates Microsoft Office for all users in the `Employees` OU.
|
||||
|
||||
By meticulously planning each of these aspects, you lay a solid foundation for your Active Directory deployment that aligns with organizational needs, simplifies management, and scales effectively with your business.
|
||||
77
tech_docs/lab/ad_lab.md
Normal file
77
tech_docs/lab/ad_lab.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
||||
Certainly, creating a more detailed and structured guide with a visual component will make the setup process clearer and more approachable. Below is an enhanced guide that outlines a sample framework for setting up an Active Directory (AD) environment focused on cybersecurity testing. This includes both markdown documentation and a Mermaid diagram for visualization.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Active Directory Setup Framework for Cybersecurity Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This guide provides a detailed starting point for setting up a simulated Active Directory environment tailored for cybersecurity exploration and testing. It covers essential steps from initial planning and installation to security configurations and testing groundwork.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Planning and Design
|
||||
|
||||
Before diving into the installation, it's crucial to lay out the design and planning of your AD environment. This includes determining the domain structure, planning the network infrastructure, and deciding on security group and OU designs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain Structure
|
||||
- **Domain Name:** `cyberlab.local`
|
||||
- **Forest Design:** Single forest, single domain
|
||||
|
||||
### Network Infrastructure
|
||||
- Consider a simple network layout with a primary domain controller (PDC) and additional domain controllers (ADCs) as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Groups and OUs
|
||||
- Create OUs for different departments or teams, e.g., `IT`, `HR`, `Sales`.
|
||||
- Plan security groups for role-based access control (RBAC), e.g., `IT Admins`, `HR Managers`.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Installation and Core Setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Install Windows Server
|
||||
- **Version:** Windows Server 2019 Standard
|
||||
- **Machine:** VM or physical server for the PDC
|
||||
|
||||
### Promote to Domain Controller
|
||||
- Install the Active Directory Domain Services role.
|
||||
- Run the AD DS Configuration Wizard to promote the server to a domain controller.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Security Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Baseline Security Policies
|
||||
- Implement GPOs for security policies affecting users and machines.
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Accounts
|
||||
- Populate the AD with test user accounts and groups reflecting various roles.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Advanced Features and Testing Preparation
|
||||
|
||||
### Advanced AD Services
|
||||
- Optionally, explore setting up ADFS, AD CS, and AD RMS for advanced testing scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Maintenance and Continuous Improvement
|
||||
|
||||
### Regular Updates
|
||||
- Apply updates and patches regularly to keep the environment secure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sample Mermaid Diagram
|
||||
|
||||
To visualize the setup, here's a Mermaid diagram illustrating a basic AD setup:
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD;
|
||||
A[Windows Server 2019] -->|Installs AD DS| B(PDC: Primary Domain Controller);
|
||||
B --> C{Domain: cyberlab.local};
|
||||
C --> D[OU: IT];
|
||||
C --> E[OU: HR];
|
||||
C --> F[OU: Sales];
|
||||
D --> G[Security Group: IT Admins];
|
||||
E --> H[Security Group: HR Managers];
|
||||
B --> I[ADCS Advanced Services];
|
||||
I --> J[ADFS];
|
||||
I --> K[AD CS];
|
||||
I --> L[AD RMS];
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This diagram illustrates the foundational elements of the AD setup, including the primary domain controller (PDC) setup with Windows Server 2019, the creation of organizational units (OUs) for IT, HR, and Sales departments, and the setup of security groups within those OUs. It also highlights the incorporation of advanced AD services like ADFS, Certificate Services, and Rights Management Services for comprehensive security testing.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This framework and visual guide offer a solid starting point for setting up an AD environment optimized for cybersecurity testing and training. It's a flexible template; you can expand or adjust it based on specific testing requirements or to explore various cybersecurity scenarios.
|
||||
225
tech_docs/lab/cyber_lab.md
Normal file
225
tech_docs/lab/cyber_lab.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
|
||||
Certainly! Here's a set of Mermaid diagrams to represent your cybersecurity lab broken into different domains:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Overall Lab Architecture:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[Host Machine] --> B[Docker]
|
||||
B --> C[Network Security Domain]
|
||||
B --> D[Web Application Security Domain]
|
||||
B --> E[Incident Response and Forensics Domain]
|
||||
B --> F[Malware Analysis Domain]
|
||||
|
||||
G[homelab.local] --> H[Active Directory Integration]
|
||||
H --> B
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. Network Security Domain:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph LR
|
||||
A[Network Security Domain] --> B[Packet Analysis]
|
||||
A --> C[Firewall Configuration]
|
||||
A --> D[Intrusion Detection and Prevention]
|
||||
A --> E[VPN and Secure Communication]
|
||||
|
||||
B --> F[Wireshark]
|
||||
B --> G[tcpdump]
|
||||
|
||||
C --> H[iptables]
|
||||
C --> I[pfSense]
|
||||
|
||||
D --> J[Snort]
|
||||
D --> K[Suricata]
|
||||
|
||||
E --> L[OpenVPN]
|
||||
E --> M[WireGuard]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. Web Application Security Domain:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph LR
|
||||
A[Web Application Security Domain] --> B[Vulnerability Assessment]
|
||||
A --> C[Penetration Testing]
|
||||
A --> D[Web Application Firewall]
|
||||
A --> E[API Security]
|
||||
|
||||
B --> F[OWASP ZAP]
|
||||
B --> G[Burp Suite]
|
||||
B --> H[Nikto]
|
||||
|
||||
C --> I[Metasploit]
|
||||
C --> J[sqlmap]
|
||||
C --> K[BeEF]
|
||||
|
||||
D --> L[ModSecurity]
|
||||
D --> M[NAXSI]
|
||||
|
||||
E --> N[Postman]
|
||||
E --> O[Swagger]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. Incident Response and Forensics Domain:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph LR
|
||||
A[Incident Response and Forensics Domain] --> B[Incident Response Planning]
|
||||
A --> C[Log Analysis]
|
||||
A --> D[Memory Forensics]
|
||||
A --> E[Network Forensics]
|
||||
|
||||
C --> F[ELK Stack]
|
||||
C --> G[Splunk]
|
||||
|
||||
D --> H[Volatility]
|
||||
D --> I[Rekall]
|
||||
|
||||
E --> J[NetworkMiner]
|
||||
E --> K[Xplico]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
5. Malware Analysis Domain:
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph LR
|
||||
A[Malware Analysis Domain] --> B[Static Analysis]
|
||||
A --> C[Dynamic Analysis]
|
||||
A --> D[Reverse Engineering]
|
||||
A --> E[Malware Dissection]
|
||||
|
||||
B --> F[IDA Pro]
|
||||
B --> G[Ghidra]
|
||||
B --> H[Radare2]
|
||||
|
||||
C --> I[Cuckoo Sandbox]
|
||||
C --> J[REMnux]
|
||||
|
||||
D --> K[x64dbg]
|
||||
D --> L[OllyDbg]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These diagrams provide a visual representation of the different domains within your cybersecurity lab and the associated tools and techniques. They help in understanding the structure and components of each domain and how they fit into the overall lab architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
Feel free to customize and expand these diagrams based on your specific lab setup and requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Comprehensive Cybersecurity Lab Guide with Docker and Active Directory Integration
|
||||
|
||||
## I. Introduction
|
||||
A. Purpose and objectives of the cybersecurity lab
|
||||
B. Benefits of using Docker and Active Directory integration
|
||||
C. Overview of the lab architecture and components
|
||||
|
||||
## II. Lab Architecture
|
||||
A. Learning Paths
|
||||
1. Focused skill development and experimentation
|
||||
2. Specific cybersecurity domains (e.g., network security, web application security, incident response, malware analysis)
|
||||
B. Docker Containers
|
||||
1. Isolated and reproducible environments
|
||||
2. Efficient resource utilization and management
|
||||
C. Docker Compose
|
||||
1. Orchestration and management of containers
|
||||
2. Simplified deployment and configuration of complex security environments
|
||||
D. Active Directory Integration
|
||||
1. Centralized user and resource management
|
||||
2. Realistic enterprise network simulation
|
||||
3. Controlled security scenarios within an Active Directory environment
|
||||
|
||||
## III. Lab Setup
|
||||
A. Prerequisites
|
||||
1. Host machine or dedicated server requirements
|
||||
2. Docker and Docker Compose installation
|
||||
3. Access to the `homelab.local` Active Directory domain
|
||||
B. Active Directory Integration
|
||||
1. Ensuring proper setup and accessibility
|
||||
2. Creating necessary user accounts, security groups, and organizational units (OUs)
|
||||
C. Docker and Docker Compose Setup
|
||||
1. Installation and verification
|
||||
D. Learning Paths Structure
|
||||
1. Creating dedicated directories for each learning path
|
||||
2. Defining container environments with Dockerfiles
|
||||
3. Configuring services, networks, and volumes with docker-compose.yml files
|
||||
E. Configuration and Deployment
|
||||
1. Customizing Dockerfiles for each learning path
|
||||
2. Modifying docker-compose.yml files for specific security scenarios or tools
|
||||
3. Building and deploying containers using Docker Compose
|
||||
F. Central Management
|
||||
1. Creating a central docker-compose.yml file for collective management
|
||||
2. Utilizing web-based GUI tools (e.g., Portainer, Rancher) for container management and monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
## IV. Cybersecurity Learning Paths
|
||||
A. Network Security
|
||||
1. Packet Analysis
|
||||
2. Firewall Configuration
|
||||
3. Intrusion Detection and Prevention
|
||||
4. VPN and Secure Communication
|
||||
B. Web Application Security
|
||||
1. Vulnerability Assessment
|
||||
2. Penetration Testing
|
||||
3. Web Application Firewall (WAF)
|
||||
4. API Security
|
||||
C. Incident Response and Forensics
|
||||
1. Incident Response Planning
|
||||
2. Log Analysis
|
||||
3. Memory Forensics
|
||||
4. Network Forensics
|
||||
D. Malware Analysis
|
||||
1. Static Analysis
|
||||
2. Dynamic Analysis
|
||||
3. Reverse Engineering
|
||||
4. Malware Dissection
|
||||
|
||||
## V. Example Scenarios
|
||||
A. Ransomware Attack Simulation
|
||||
1. Objective and steps
|
||||
2. Mermaid diagram illustrating the scenario flow
|
||||
B. Web Application Penetration Testing
|
||||
1. Objective and steps
|
||||
2. Mermaid diagram illustrating the scenario flow
|
||||
C. Malware Analysis and Reverse Engineering
|
||||
1. Objective and steps
|
||||
2. Mermaid diagram illustrating the scenario flow
|
||||
|
||||
## VI. Best Practices and Recommendations
|
||||
A. Security Configurations
|
||||
1. Implementing security best practices for Docker and Active Directory
|
||||
2. Managing container access and permissions
|
||||
B. Regular Updates and Maintenance
|
||||
1. Keeping Docker images and containers up to date
|
||||
2. Applying security patches and updates regularly
|
||||
C. Data Persistence and Backup
|
||||
1. Utilizing Docker volumes for data persistence
|
||||
2. Implementing backup strategies for critical data and configurations
|
||||
D. Resource Optimization and Monitoring
|
||||
1. Monitoring and optimizing resource utilization
|
||||
2. Implementing logging and monitoring solutions for containers and Active Directory
|
||||
E. Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing
|
||||
1. Encouraging a culture of sharing and collaboration among team members
|
||||
2. Utilizing version control and documentation for effective knowledge management
|
||||
|
||||
## VII. Advanced Concepts and Considerations
|
||||
A. Integration with Cloud Platforms
|
||||
1. Exploring options for integrating the lab with cloud platforms (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)
|
||||
2. Leveraging cloud-based services for scalability, high availability, and cost-efficiency
|
||||
B. Automated Provisioning and Deployment
|
||||
1. Implementing Infrastructure as Code (IaC) practices
|
||||
2. Utilizing configuration management tools (e.g., Ansible, Puppet) for automated lab provisioning
|
||||
C. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD)
|
||||
1. Integrating the lab with CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
2. Automating the build, testing, and deployment processes for lab environments
|
||||
D. Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)
|
||||
1. Implementing SOAR capabilities within the lab
|
||||
2. Automating incident response and security workflows
|
||||
E. Compliance and Regulatory Considerations
|
||||
1. Aligning the lab with relevant security standards and regulations
|
||||
2. Implementing compliance monitoring and reporting mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
## VIII. Conclusion
|
||||
A. Recap of the key points and benefits of the cybersecurity lab
|
||||
B. Importance of continuous learning and staying updated with the latest security trends and techniques
|
||||
C. Encouragement to explore, experiment, and collaborate within the lab environment
|
||||
|
||||
## IX. References and Resources
|
||||
A. Official documentation for Docker, Docker Compose, and Active Directory
|
||||
B. Recommended security tools and frameworks
|
||||
C. Relevant online communities and forums for cybersecurity professionals
|
||||
D. Additional reading materials and tutorials for advanced topics and concepts
|
||||
|
||||
This outline provides a comprehensive structure for the cybersecurity lab guide, covering all the essential aspects from lab architecture and setup to learning paths, example scenarios, best practices, and advanced considerations. The guide aims to empower readers with the knowledge and tools necessary to build a robust and flexible cybersecurity lab environment using Docker and Active Directory integration. By following the outlined steps and recommendations, readers can develop practical skills, explore various security domains, and stay ahead of the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user