Update tech_docs/lab/AD_planning.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,58 +1,210 @@
|
||||
### Planning Phase for Active Directory Deployment
|
||||
You're off to a strong start. Below is an **expanded and enhanced version** of your planning guide that incorporates **deeper technical detail**, **industry best practices**, and **real-world implementation context**—ideal for both practical lab use and enterprise-grade deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
The planning phase is critical in setting up an Active Directory (AD) environment that is scalable, secure, and meets the organizational needs efficiently. Let's delve deeper into each aspect of this phase.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. **Determine Domain Structure**
|
||||
## 🔧 **Planning Phase for Active Directory Deployment**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Single vs. Multiple Domains:** A single domain is often sufficient for small to medium-sized organizations with a centralized management structure. Multiple domains might be necessary for large or geographically dispersed organizations, especially if there are distinct administrative boundaries, different password policies, or security requirements.
|
||||
- **Example:** A multinational corporation with operations in the US and Europe might opt for `us.corp.example.com` and `eu.corp.example.com` to cater to specific regulatory requirements and administrative autonomy in each region.
|
||||
The planning phase is foundational to a successful Active Directory (AD) deployment. A misstep at this stage can lead to cascading issues in scalability, security, replication, and administrative overhead. Below is a comprehensive breakdown with real-world context and technical depth.
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. **Design OU Structure**
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
- **Purpose of OUs:** Organizational Units (OUs) are containers in AD that help in grouping objects such as users, groups, and computers. They facilitate delegation of administrative rights and the application of policies at a granular level.
|
||||
- **Planning Considerations:** When designing the OU structure, consider factors like the number of departments, the need for delegation of administrative rights, and the granularity required for Group Policy application.
|
||||
- **Example Structure:**
|
||||
- Root Domain: `corp.example.com`
|
||||
- `Employees`
|
||||
- `HR`
|
||||
- `Engineering`
|
||||
- `Sales`
|
||||
- `Service Accounts`
|
||||
- `Workstations`
|
||||
- `Laptops`
|
||||
- `Desktops`
|
||||
- `Servers`
|
||||
- `Application Servers`
|
||||
- `File Servers`
|
||||
### 1. 🏛️ **Determine Domain Structure**
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. **Plan AD Sites and Services**
|
||||
* **Single Domain:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Role of AD Sites:** Sites in AD represent physical or network topology. Their correct configuration is crucial for optimizing authentication and replication traffic, especially in a geographically dispersed environment.
|
||||
- **Site Planning:** Base your site structure on the location of your network’s subnets and the physical topology, ensuring efficient replication across WAN links and optimal client authentication processes.
|
||||
- **Example Configuration:**
|
||||
- Site Names: `SiteNY`, `SiteLA`
|
||||
- `SiteNY` associates with subnet `192.168.10.0/24`
|
||||
- `SiteLA` associates with subnet `192.168.20.0/24`
|
||||
- Define site link `NY-LA` to manage replication between the two sites.
|
||||
* Suitable for organizations with centralized IT teams and uniform policies.
|
||||
* Easier replication topology and management.
|
||||
* Simpler trust model—no external or forest trusts needed.
|
||||
* **Multiple Domains:**
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. **Decide on Naming Conventions**
|
||||
* Required when:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Importance:** Consistent naming conventions enhance clarity, simplify management, and support automation.
|
||||
- **Considerations:** Include readability, uniqueness, and future scalability in your naming conventions. Avoid using special characters or overly complex formats.
|
||||
- **Examples:**
|
||||
- **Usernames:** `firstname.lastname@corp.example.com`
|
||||
- **Computers:** `[location]-[dept]-[serial]` e.g., `NY-HR-12345`
|
||||
- **Groups:** `[purpose]-[scope]-[region]-[description]` e.g., `Access-Global-HR-Managers`
|
||||
* Legal constraints demand data separation (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA).
|
||||
* Independent business units have conflicting policies (e.g., different password lengths).
|
||||
* Mergers and acquisitions introduce separate legacy domains.
|
||||
* **Trees and Forests:**
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5. **Design Group Policy Objects (GPOs)**
|
||||
* Forest = Security boundary (separate schema and global catalog).
|
||||
* Avoid multiple forests unless truly required (cross-forest trust complexity is high).
|
||||
|
||||
- **GPO Strategy:** Start with a minimal number of GPOs and only create more as needed to meet specific requirements. This approach keeps the environment manageable and reduces troubleshooting complexity.
|
||||
- **Common GPOs:**
|
||||
- **Security Policy:** Enforces password policies, account lockout policies, and Kerberos policies.
|
||||
- Example: Password Policy GPO with settings for password complexity, minimum length, and history.
|
||||
- **Desktop Configuration:** Manages desktop environments across users or computers, including settings for desktop icons, wallpaper, and start menu layout.
|
||||
- Example: Desktop Lockdown GPO that restricts access to control panel and command prompt.
|
||||
- **Software Deployment:** Facilitates centralized deployment and updates of applications.
|
||||
- Example: Office Suite Deployment GPO that automatically installs or updates Microsoft Office for all users in the `Employees` OU.
|
||||
**🧠 Pro Tip:** Always prefer a **flat domain model** unless you **must** segment administrative boundaries or legal zones.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. 🗂️ **Design Organizational Unit (OU) Structure**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Why It Matters:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Enables targeted application of GPOs.
|
||||
* Facilitates delegation of administrative control to different teams (e.g., helpdesk only managing `Workstations`).
|
||||
* **Best Practices:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Use functional boundaries (e.g., `Workstations`, `Servers`) **not** geographic or organizational names (which can change).
|
||||
* Avoid deep nesting (increases GPO evaluation time).
|
||||
* Don't design based on temporary org charts.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example OU Delegation Use-Case:**
|
||||
Allow `HR` support staff to reset passwords only for accounts within `OU=HR,OU=Employees`.
|
||||
|
||||
**🧠 Pro Tip:** Use **Active Directory Delegation Wizard** and audit changes with **Advanced Security Auditing**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. 🌐 **Plan AD Sites and Services**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Why It Matters:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Affects **logon performance**, **replication efficiency**, and **DC selection**.
|
||||
* Helps define **replication boundaries**, especially over slow WAN links.
|
||||
* **Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify physical locations with domain-joined systems.
|
||||
2. Map subnets to each site.
|
||||
3. Define **site links** and **costs** to control replication paths.
|
||||
|
||||
**Design Example:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Site: `Asia-Manila`
|
||||
Subnet: `10.15.0.0/16`
|
||||
Link: `Asia-to-US`, Replication every 3 hours (180 minutes), cost 100
|
||||
|
||||
**🧠 Pro Tip:** Use `repadmin /showrepl` and `dcdiag /test:replications` to validate your topology post-deployment.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. 🔤 **Decide on Naming Conventions**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Benefits:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Supports scripting, monitoring, and reporting.
|
||||
* Prevents name conflicts.
|
||||
* Enables automation with tools like PowerShell, Terraform, Ansible.
|
||||
* **User Object Naming:**
|
||||
|
||||
* `first.last` or `firstinitial.lastname`
|
||||
* UPN suffix should match email (`@corp.example.com`)
|
||||
* **Computer Object Naming:**
|
||||
|
||||
* `[Region]-[Function]-[AssetID]`, e.g., `SG-ENG-WS1234`
|
||||
* **Groups:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Use consistent prefixes (e.g., `G_`, `DL_`, `SG_` for Global, Domain Local, and Security groups).
|
||||
|
||||
**🧠 Pro Tip:** Store naming convention logic in internal documentation or an **AD schema extension** attribute for automated validations.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. 📜 **Design Group Policy Objects (GPOs)**
|
||||
|
||||
* **GPO Design Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Layered Approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Default Domain Policy** – only for account policies (e.g., password, Kerberos).
|
||||
2. **Default Domain Controllers Policy** – for auditing and local security policies on DCs.
|
||||
3. **Custom GPOs per function** – e.g., `GPO-WorkstationHardening`, `GPO-ServerFirewall`, `GPO-LockScreenTimeout`.
|
||||
* **Link GPOs to OUs**, not users/computers directly.
|
||||
* **Avoid:** Blocking inheritance or enforcing GPOs unless absolutely necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Common GPO Categories:**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Security GPOs:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Password policies, audit policy, User Rights Assignment (e.g., who can log on locally).
|
||||
* **Configuration GPOs:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Registry settings, script execution, folder redirection.
|
||||
* **Application Deployment:**
|
||||
|
||||
* MSI push via Software Installation policy or SCCM/Intune integration.
|
||||
|
||||
**🧠 Pro Tip:** Use `gpresult /h report.html` or **Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP)** to troubleshoot and validate policy applications.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔒 Bonus: **Security and Compliance Planning**
|
||||
|
||||
* **Privileged Access Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Use separate accounts for administrative tasks (e.g., `j.davis.admin`).
|
||||
* Consider **Tiered Administration Model** (Tier 0 = DCs, Tier 1 = servers, Tier 2 = workstations).
|
||||
* **Audit Logging:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Enable **Advanced Auditing** for changes to user objects, group memberships, GPOs.
|
||||
* **Baseline Hardening:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Leverage Microsoft's **Security Compliance Toolkit**.
|
||||
* Apply CIS or STIG benchmarks to harden AD DS and member systems.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 🧪 Suggested Tools & References
|
||||
|
||||
* **Planning Tools:**
|
||||
|
||||
* [Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit (MAP)](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=7826)
|
||||
* [AD Topology Diagrammer](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=13380)
|
||||
* **Simulation & Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
* Use `VirtualBox`, `Hyper-V`, or `Proxmox` to simulate a multi-site AD lab.
|
||||
* Integrate **Wireshark** and **Sysinternals Suite** for deeper diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
Here’s a **Mermaid diagram** to visually represent the **Active Directory Planning Phase**, focusing on the domain structure, OU hierarchy, site topology, and GPO linkage. This is meant to accompany your written guide for both documentation and lab visualization purposes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ **Mermaid Diagram – Active Directory Deployment Planning**
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[corp.example.com] --> B[Organizational Units]
|
||||
A --> C[Sites and Services]
|
||||
A --> D[Naming Conventions]
|
||||
A --> E[Group Policy Objects (GPOs)]
|
||||
|
||||
B --> B1[Employees]
|
||||
B1 --> B1a[HR]
|
||||
B1 --> B1b[Engineering]
|
||||
B1 --> B1c[Sales]
|
||||
B --> B2[Service Accounts]
|
||||
B --> B3[Workstations]
|
||||
B3 --> B3a[Laptops]
|
||||
B3 --> B3b[Desktops]
|
||||
B --> B4[Servers]
|
||||
B4 --> B4a[App Servers]
|
||||
B4 --> B4b[File Servers]
|
||||
|
||||
C --> C1[Site: NY - 192.168.10.0/24]
|
||||
C --> C2[Site: LA - 192.168.20.0/24]
|
||||
C1 --> C3[DC1 - NY]
|
||||
C2 --> C4[DC2 - LA]
|
||||
C --> C5[Site Link: NY-LA (Cost 100)]
|
||||
|
||||
D --> D1[Usernames: firstname.lastname]
|
||||
D --> D2[Computers: location-dept-serial]
|
||||
D --> D3[Groups: purpose-scope-region-desc]
|
||||
|
||||
E --> E1[Security GPOs]
|
||||
E --> E2[Desktop Config GPOs]
|
||||
E --> E3[Software Deployment GPOs]
|
||||
|
||||
E1 --> E1a[Password Policy]
|
||||
E1 --> E1b[Account Lockout Policy]
|
||||
|
||||
E2 --> E2a[Wallpaper Settings]
|
||||
E2 --> E2b[Control Panel Lockdown]
|
||||
|
||||
E3 --> E3a[Office Deployment]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 📌 Notes:
|
||||
|
||||
* This diagram assumes a **flat domain model** with a single domain.
|
||||
* You can extend this to multi-domain or forest views if needed.
|
||||
* Each node represents a planning decision or implementation detail that can be expanded into its own configuration documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like a **version with links or tooltips** for web display (e.g., GitHub Pages or MkDocs)? Or a printable PNG/SVG export for slide decks or internal wikis?
|
||||
|
||||
By meticulously planning each of these aspects, you lay a solid foundation for your Active Directory deployment that aligns with organizational needs, simplifies management, and scales effectively with your business.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user