medusa/the_information_nexus
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
main
the_information_nexus/tech_docs/lab/AD_planning.md

8.9 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

You're off to a strong start. Below is an expanded and enhanced version of your planning guide that incorporates deeper technical detail, industry best practices, and real-world implementation context—ideal for both practical lab use and enterprise-grade deployments.

🔧 Planning Phase for Active Directory Deployment

The planning phase is foundational to a successful Active Directory (AD) deployment. A misstep at this stage can lead to cascading issues in scalability, security, replication, and administrative overhead. Below is a comprehensive breakdown with real-world context and technical depth.

1. 🏛️ Determine Domain Structure

  • Single Domain:

    • Suitable for organizations with centralized IT teams and uniform policies.
    • Easier replication topology and management.
    • Simpler trust model—no external or forest trusts needed.

  • Multiple Domains:

    • Required when:

      • Legal constraints demand data separation (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA).
      • Independent business units have conflicting policies (e.g., different password lengths).
      • Mergers and acquisitions introduce separate legacy domains.

  • Trees and Forests:

    • Forest = Security boundary (separate schema and global catalog).
    • Avoid multiple forests unless truly required (cross-forest trust complexity is high).

🧠 Pro Tip: Always prefer a flat domain model unless you must segment administrative boundaries or legal zones.

2. 🗂️ Design Organizational Unit (OU) Structure

  • Why It Matters:

    • Enables targeted application of GPOs.
    • Facilitates delegation of administrative control to different teams (e.g., helpdesk only managing Workstations).

  • Best Practices:

    • Use functional boundaries (e.g., Workstations, Servers) not geographic or organizational names (which can change).
    • Avoid deep nesting (increases GPO evaluation time).
    • Don't design based on temporary org charts.

Example OU Delegation Use-Case: Allow HR support staff to reset passwords only for accounts within OU=HR,OU=Employees.

🧠 Pro Tip: Use Active Directory Delegation Wizard and audit changes with Advanced Security Auditing.

3. 🌐 Plan AD Sites and Services

  • Why It Matters:

    • Affects logon performance, replication efficiency, and DC selection.
    • Helps define replication boundaries, especially over slow WAN links.

  • Steps:

    1. Identify physical locations with domain-joined systems.
    2. Map subnets to each site.
    3. Define site links and costs to control replication paths.

Design Example:

  • Site: Asia-Manila Subnet: 10.15.0.0/16 Link: Asia-to-US, Replication every 3 hours (180 minutes), cost 100

🧠 Pro Tip: Use repadmin /showrepl and dcdiag /test:replications to validate your topology post-deployment.

4. 🔤 Decide on Naming Conventions

  • Benefits:

    • Supports scripting, monitoring, and reporting.
    • Prevents name conflicts.
    • Enables automation with tools like PowerShell, Terraform, Ansible.

  • User Object Naming:

    • first.last or firstinitial.lastname
    • UPN suffix should match email (@corp.example.com)

  • Computer Object Naming:

    • [Region]-[Function]-[AssetID], e.g., SG-ENG-WS1234

  • Groups:

    • Use consistent prefixes (e.g., G_, DL_, SG_ for Global, Domain Local, and Security groups).

🧠 Pro Tip: Store naming convention logic in internal documentation or an AD schema extension attribute for automated validations.

5. 📜 Design Group Policy Objects (GPOs)

  • GPO Design Strategy:

    • Layered Approach:

      1. Default Domain Policy – only for account policies (e.g., password, Kerberos).
      2. Default Domain Controllers Policy – for auditing and local security policies on DCs.
      3. Custom GPOs per function – e.g., GPO-WorkstationHardening, GPO-ServerFirewall, GPO-LockScreenTimeout.

    • Link GPOs to OUs, not users/computers directly.

  • Avoid: Blocking inheritance or enforcing GPOs unless absolutely necessary.

Common GPO Categories:

  • Security GPOs:

    • Password policies, audit policy, User Rights Assignment (e.g., who can log on locally).

  • Configuration GPOs:

    • Registry settings, script execution, folder redirection.

  • Application Deployment:

    • MSI push via Software Installation policy or SCCM/Intune integration.

🧠 Pro Tip: Use gpresult /h report.html or Resultant Set of Policy (RSoP) to troubleshoot and validate policy applications.

🔒 Bonus: Security and Compliance Planning

  • Privileged Access Strategy:

    • Use separate accounts for administrative tasks (e.g., j.davis.admin).
    • Consider Tiered Administration Model (Tier 0 = DCs, Tier 1 = servers, Tier 2 = workstations).

  • Audit Logging:

    • Enable Advanced Auditing for changes to user objects, group memberships, GPOs.

  • Baseline Hardening:

    • Leverage Microsoft's Security Compliance Toolkit.
    • Apply CIS or STIG benchmarks to harden AD DS and member systems.

🧪 Suggested Tools & References

Here’s a Mermaid diagram to visually represent the Active Directory Planning Phase, focusing on the domain structure, OU hierarchy, site topology, and GPO linkage. This is meant to accompany your written guide for both documentation and lab visualization purposes.

✅ Mermaid Diagram – Active Directory Deployment Planning

graph TD
  A[corp.example.com] --> B[Organizational Units]
  A --> C[Sites and Services]
  A --> D[Naming Conventions]
  A --> E[Group Policy Objects (GPOs)]

  B --> B1[Employees]
  B1 --> B1a[HR]
  B1 --> B1b[Engineering]
  B1 --> B1c[Sales]
  B --> B2[Service Accounts]
  B --> B3[Workstations]
  B3 --> B3a[Laptops]
  B3 --> B3b[Desktops]
  B --> B4[Servers]
  B4 --> B4a[App Servers]
  B4 --> B4b[File Servers]

  C --> C1[Site: NY - 192.168.10.0/24]
  C --> C2[Site: LA - 192.168.20.0/24]
  C1 --> C3[DC1 - NY]
  C2 --> C4[DC2 - LA]
  C --> C5[Site Link: NY-LA (Cost 100)]

  D --> D1[Usernames: firstname.lastname]
  D --> D2[Computers: location-dept-serial]
  D --> D3[Groups: purpose-scope-region-desc]

  E --> E1[Security GPOs]
  E --> E2[Desktop Config GPOs]
  E --> E3[Software Deployment GPOs]

  E1 --> E1a[Password Policy]
  E1 --> E1b[Account Lockout Policy]

  E2 --> E2a[Wallpaper Settings]
  E2 --> E2b[Control Panel Lockdown]

  E3 --> E3a[Office Deployment]

📌 Notes:

  • This diagram assumes a flat domain model with a single domain.
  • You can extend this to multi-domain or forest views if needed.
  • Each node represents a planning decision or implementation detail that can be expanded into its own configuration documentation.

Would you like a version with links or tooltips for web display (e.g., GitHub Pages or MkDocs)? Or a printable PNG/SVG export for slide decks or internal wikis?

Ah, good catch! That error is due to special characters or formatting that Mermaid doesn’t handle well inside square brackets. Specifically, the parentheses in Group Policy Objects (GPOs) are not valid in label definitions inside [].

Here’s the corrected version of the diagram with compliant syntax:

✅ Fixed Mermaid Diagram – Active Directory Deployment Planning

graph TD
  A[corp.example.com] --> B[Organizational Units]
  A --> C[Sites and Services]
  A --> D[Naming Conventions]
  A --> E[Group Policy Objects]

  B --> B1[Employees]
  B1 --> B1a[HR]
  B1 --> B1b[Engineering]
  B1 --> B1c[Sales]
  B --> B2[Service Accounts]
  B --> B3[Workstations]
  B3 --> B3a[Laptops]
  B3 --> B3b[Desktops]
  B --> B4[Servers]
  B4 --> B4a[App Servers]
  B4 --> B4b[File Servers]

  C --> C1[Site NY - 192.168.10.0/24]
  C --> C2[Site LA - 192.168.20.0/24]
  C1 --> C3[Domain Controller NY]
  C2 --> C4[Domain Controller LA]
  C --> C5[Site Link NY-LA]

  D --> D1[Usernames: firstname.lastname]
  D --> D2[Computers: location-dept-serial]
  D --> D3[Groups: purpose-scope-region-desc]

  E --> E1[Security Policies]
  E --> E2[Desktop Settings]
  E --> E3[Software Deployment]

  E1 --> E1a[Password Policy]
  E1 --> E1b[Account Lockout Policy]

  E2 --> E2a[Wallpaper Settings]
  E2 --> E2b[Control Panel Restrictions]

  E3 --> E3a[Office Deployment]

This version will render without errors in Mermaid.js parsers (like in Markdown viewers or tools like Obsidian, MkDocs, VS Code extensions, etc.).

Would you like me to also generate a dark-mode variant, or an SVG version you can embed into a GitHub repo or documentation?