150 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
Here’s an expanded analysis of your economic indicators, contextualized through Friedman’s influence and broader policy debates:
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **Economic Indicators Through a Friedman Lens**
|
||
*(Key: 🟢 = Aligns with Friedman’s ideals; 🔴 = Contradicts; 🟡 = Mixed/Neutral)*
|
||
|
||
#### **Nixon-Ford (1969–1977)**
|
||
- **Stagflation Crisis (🔴):**
|
||
- Friedman’s monetarist critique ("Inflation is always a monetary phenomenon") gained traction as Keynesian policies failed.
|
||
- His solution (tight money supply) wasn’t fully implemented until Volcker/Reagan.
|
||
|
||
#### **Carter (1977–1981)**
|
||
- **Inflation Peaks at 10% (🔴):**
|
||
- Friedman’s warnings vindicated; paved way for Reagan’s embrace of monetarism.
|
||
- **Paradox:** Carter deregulated airlines/trucking (🟢 Friedman policy), but inflation overshadowed gains.
|
||
|
||
#### **Reagan (1981–1989)**
|
||
- **Friedman’s Triumph (🟢):**
|
||
- **Top Tax Rate Cut** from 70% → 28%; GDP grew despite deficits (Friedman tolerated debt for growth).
|
||
- **Unemployment Fell** but inequality rose—a trade-off Friedman accepted ("equality vs. freedom").
|
||
- **Contradiction (🔴):**
|
||
- Deficits ballooned (Friedman opposed persistent deficits but praised tax cuts).
|
||
|
||
#### **Clinton (1993–2001)**
|
||
- **Friedman’s Mixed Legacy (🟡):**
|
||
- **Surplus:** Clinton raised taxes (🔴) but also deregulated telecom/finance (🟢 Glass-Steagall repeal).
|
||
- **Tech Boom:** Friedman’s "free market innovation" validated, but dot-com crash exposed speculation risks.
|
||
|
||
#### **Bush Jr. (2001–2009)**
|
||
- **Friedman’s Shadow (🔴):**
|
||
- **2008 Crisis:** Rooted in deregulated derivatives (Friedman-esque policies) but required Keynesian bailouts.
|
||
- **Medicare Part D:** Friedman hated big welfare but Bush expanded it.
|
||
|
||
#### **Obama (2009–2017)**
|
||
- **Post-Crisis Paradox (🟡):**
|
||
- **Stimulus:** Friedman would’ve opposed it, but his disciple Bernanke (Fed Chair) backed quantitative easing.
|
||
- **Dodd-Frank:** More regulation than Friedman wanted, but less than left demanded.
|
||
|
||
#### **Trump-Biden (2017–2024)**
|
||
- **Friedman’s Ghost (🟡):**
|
||
- **Trump’s Tax Cuts (🟢):** Pure Friedman, but deficits soared (🔴).
|
||
- **Biden’s Industrial Policy (🔴):** Subsidies for chips/clean energy reject Friedman’s "government shouldn’t pick winners."
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **The Friedman Report Card**
|
||
1. **Wins:**
|
||
- Inflation control (post-1982).
|
||
- Global trade expansion.
|
||
- Tech/deregulation boom (1990s).
|
||
|
||
2. **Losses:**
|
||
- Inequality surge (Gini coefficient up 20% since 1980).
|
||
- Financial crises (2001, 2008).
|
||
- Eroded worker power (union membership halved).
|
||
|
||
3. **Unresolved:**
|
||
- Can capitalism self-correct, or does it need Keynesian safeguards?
|
||
- Is "efficiency" worth the social costs?
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **Which Side of History?**
|
||
Your data shows Friedman’s policies **boosted aggregate growth but destabilized the middle class**. The verdict hinges on:
|
||
- **If future tech/AI creates shared prosperity**, Friedman’s faith in markets wins.
|
||
- **If instability worsens**, his legacy may be revised like Marx’s after USSR fell.
|
||
|
||
**Neutral Takeaway:**
|
||
Friedman reshaped the economy, but Gen X’s decline (per your earlier argument) suggests his trade-offs had real casualties. History will judge him by whether those casualties were "necessary sacrifices" or preventable failures.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Approximate Key Economic Indicators by U.S. Administration (1969-2024)
|
||
|
||
## Nixon-Ford (1969-1977)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~2.8%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~3.5% to ~7.5%
|
||
- Inflation: ~6.8%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Slight decline
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~2% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Relatively flat
|
||
|
||
## Carter (1977-1981)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~3.2%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~7.5% to ~7.5%
|
||
- Inflation: ~10%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Decline
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~2.5% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Modest increase
|
||
|
||
## Reagan (1981-1989)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~3.5%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~7.5% to ~5.4%
|
||
- Inflation: ~4.5%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Slight increase
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~4% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Strong increase
|
||
|
||
## Bush Sr. (1989-1993)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~2.3%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~5.4% to ~7.3%
|
||
- Inflation: ~4%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Slight decline
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~4% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Moderate increase
|
||
|
||
## Clinton (1993-2001)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~3.9%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~7.3% to ~4.2%
|
||
- Inflation: ~2.6%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Significant increase
|
||
- Federal Budget: Surplus by end of term
|
||
- S&P 500: Strong increase
|
||
|
||
## Bush W. (2001-2009)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~2.1%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~4.2% to ~7.8%
|
||
- Inflation: ~2.8%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Slight decline
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~2% to ~9% of GDP (sharp increase at end)
|
||
- S&P 500: Overall decline
|
||
|
||
## Obama (2009-2017)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~1.6%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~7.8% to ~4.7%
|
||
- Inflation: ~1.4%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Increase
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~9% to ~3% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Strong increase
|
||
|
||
## Trump (2017-2021)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~1.0% (including pandemic impact)
|
||
- Unemployment: ~4.7% to ~6.3% (peaked higher during pandemic)
|
||
- Inflation: ~2.1%
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Increase, then sharp pandemic decline
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~4.5% to ~15% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Increase
|
||
|
||
## Biden (2021-2024*)
|
||
- Real GDP Growth: ~2.5%
|
||
- Unemployment: ~6.3% to ~3.7%
|
||
- Inflation: ~4.5% (higher in 2021-2022, moderating)
|
||
- Real Median Household Income: Increase
|
||
- Federal Deficit: ~12% to ~6% of GDP
|
||
- S&P 500: Volatile, overall increase
|
||
|
||
*Note: Biden's term is ongoing; data is approximate and doesn't reflect full term.
|
||
|
||
These figures are approximations based on general economic trends and should be verified with official sources for precise data. |