183 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
183 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Certainly! Let's perform a code review of the `data_ingestion.py` and `database.py` files to ensure they are free of logic and syntax errors.
|
|
|
|
`src/data/data_ingestion.py`:
|
|
|
|
1. The necessary imports are present, including `datetime`, `oandapyV20`, and the required modules from `config.keys` and `src.data.database`.
|
|
|
|
2. The `fetch_historical_data` function takes the appropriate parameters (`instrument`, `granularity`, and `count`) and uses them to make a request to Oanda's API. The response is handled correctly, and the candles data is returned.
|
|
|
|
3. The `ingest_historical_data` function calls `fetch_historical_data` with the provided parameters, creates a database connection using `create_connection()`, saves the data to the database using `save_data_to_db()`, and closes the connection. The logic is sound.
|
|
|
|
4. In the `__main__` block:
|
|
- The `instrument` and `granularity` variables are set correctly.
|
|
- The `end_date` is set to the current date using `datetime.datetime.now()`.
|
|
- The `start_date` is calculated by subtracting a timedelta of 180 days (6 months) from the `end_date`.
|
|
- The `count` is calculated correctly by dividing the total seconds between `start_date` and `end_date` by 3600 (number of seconds in an hour) to get the number of hours in the 6-month period.
|
|
- The `count` is converted to an integer using `int()` before passing it to `ingest_historical_data()`.
|
|
|
|
The syntax and logic in `data_ingestion.py` appear to be correct.
|
|
|
|
`src/data/database.py`:
|
|
|
|
1. The necessary import for `sqlite3` is present.
|
|
|
|
2. The `create_connection` function:
|
|
- Attempts to establish a connection to the SQLite3 database using `sqlite3.connect()`.
|
|
- Calls the `create_table()` function to create the `forex_data` table if it doesn't exist.
|
|
- Handles any `sqlite3.Error` exceptions and prints the error message.
|
|
- Returns the established connection.
|
|
|
|
3. The `create_table` function:
|
|
- Defines the SQL query to create the `forex_data` table with the correct schema.
|
|
- Executes the SQL query using `cursor.execute()`.
|
|
- Handles any `sqlite3.Error` exceptions and prints the error message.
|
|
|
|
4. The `save_data_to_db` function:
|
|
- Iterates over each candle in the provided `data`.
|
|
- Extracts the necessary values from the candle (timestamp, open, high, low, close, volume).
|
|
- Constructs the SQL INSERT query with the extracted values.
|
|
- Executes the SQL query using `cursor.execute()`.
|
|
- Commits the changes to the database using `conn.commit()`.
|
|
- Handles any `sqlite3.Error` exceptions and prints the error message.
|
|
|
|
The syntax and logic in `database.py` appear to be correct.
|
|
|
|
Overall, the code in both `data_ingestion.py` and `database.py` seems to be well-structured, follows best practices, and is free of any apparent syntax or logic errors.
|
|
|
|
However, it's always a good practice to thoroughly test the code with various scenarios and edge cases to ensure its robustness and reliability. Additionally, you may want to consider adding error handling and logging mechanisms to gracefully handle any unexpected errors and facilitate debugging.
|
|
|
|
If you have any further concerns or specific aspects you'd like me to review, please let me know!
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Certainly! Let's perform a code review of the `data_ingestion.py` and `database.py` files, following the structured code review process outlined in the previous response.
|
|
|
|
1. Objective and Scope:
|
|
- The objective of this code review is to ensure the correctness, efficiency, and maintainability of the code responsible for fetching and ingesting historical forex data from Oanda's API and storing it in an SQLite3 database.
|
|
- The scope includes the `data_ingestion.py` and `database.py` files located in the `src/data/` directory.
|
|
|
|
2. Preparation:
|
|
- The code is properly formatted and follows the PEP 8 style guide for Python code.
|
|
- The code is well-documented with inline comments explaining the purpose and functionality of each function.
|
|
- The code is version-controlled and assumed to be in the correct version or branch for review.
|
|
|
|
3. Overview:
|
|
- The code's purpose is to fetch historical forex data from Oanda's API, process it, and store it in an SQLite3 database.
|
|
- The code is organized into two separate files: `data_ingestion.py` for fetching and ingesting data, and `database.py` for database-related operations.
|
|
- The code follows a modular structure, with clear separation of concerns between data retrieval and database interactions.
|
|
|
|
4. Syntax and Style:
|
|
- The code is free of syntax errors and adheres to the PEP 8 style guide.
|
|
- The code uses consistent indentation, whitespace, and naming conventions.
|
|
- The variable and function names are descriptive and follow the snake_case convention.
|
|
|
|
5. Logic and Functionality:
|
|
- The `fetch_historical_data` function correctly retrieves historical forex data from Oanda's API using the provided parameters.
|
|
- The `ingest_historical_data` function appropriately calls `fetch_historical_data`, creates a database connection, saves the data, and closes the connection.
|
|
- The logic for calculating the start date and count based on the current date and the desired 6-month period is implemented correctly.
|
|
|
|
6. Error Handling and Robustness:
|
|
- The code handles potential exceptions when creating a database connection and executing SQL queries using try-except blocks.
|
|
- Any encountered exceptions are caught and printed, providing basic error handling.
|
|
- The code could be enhanced by adding more robust error handling, logging, and graceful error recovery mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
7. Security and Data Integrity:
|
|
- The code does not handle any sensitive user input or perform any data validation, as it primarily deals with retrieving and storing data from a trusted API.
|
|
- The code uses parameterized SQL queries with placeholders to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
8. Modularity and Reusability:
|
|
- The code is modularized into separate functions for fetching data, creating a database connection, creating a table, and saving data.
|
|
- The functions have clear responsibilities and can be reused independently.
|
|
- The code could be further improved by extracting configuration variables (e.g., database file path) into a separate configuration file for easier maintenance and reusability.
|
|
|
|
9. Testing and Test Coverage:
|
|
- The code does not include any unit tests or test coverage.
|
|
- It is recommended to add unit tests to verify the correctness of individual functions and ensure the code behaves as expected.
|
|
- Integration tests could be added to validate the end-to-end flow of fetching data from the API and storing it in the database.
|
|
|
|
10. Documentation and Comments:
|
|
- The code includes inline comments explaining the purpose and functionality of each function.
|
|
- The comments are concise and provide a clear understanding of what each part of the code does.
|
|
- Additional documentation, such as a README file or API documentation, could be beneficial to provide an overview of the project and instructions for running and using the code.
|
|
|
|
11. Collaboration and Feedback:
|
|
- The code review process should involve collaboration with the code author or team members to discuss any questions, concerns, or suggestions for improvement.
|
|
- Feedback should be provided in a constructive and specific manner, highlighting areas of improvement and recognizing well-written code.
|
|
|
|
12. Iteration and Follow-up:
|
|
- Based on the feedback and suggestions from the code review, any necessary changes or improvements should be implemented.
|
|
- The updated code should be thoroughly tested to ensure the changes are correct and do not introduce any new issues.
|
|
- A follow-up review can be conducted if significant changes or refactoring are required.
|
|
|
|
Overall, the code in `data_ingestion.py` and `database.py` is well-structured, follows best practices, and achieves its intended functionality. However, there are opportunities for improvement, such as adding error handling, logging, unit tests, and documentation.
|
|
|
|
By following this structured code review process, you can ensure a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of the code, promoting code quality, maintainability, and collaboration among team members.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
1. Objective and Scope:
|
|
- Clearly define the objective and scope of the code review.
|
|
- Determine the specific components, modules, or files to be reviewed.
|
|
- Identify any specific areas of focus or concerns to be addressed during the review.
|
|
|
|
2. Preparation:
|
|
- Ensure that the code is properly formatted and follows the agreed-upon coding style and conventions.
|
|
- Make sure the code is well-documented, including inline comments and relevant documentation.
|
|
- Verify that the code is version-controlled and the relevant version or branch is being reviewed.
|
|
|
|
3. Overview:
|
|
- Start by gaining an overall understanding of the code's purpose, functionality, and architecture.
|
|
- Review the high-level structure and organization of the code.
|
|
- Check if the code adheres to the project's design patterns, conventions, and best practices.
|
|
|
|
4. Syntax and Style:
|
|
- Examine the code for any syntax errors or potential issues flagged by linters or static analysis tools.
|
|
- Verify that the code follows the agreed-upon coding style guidelines consistently.
|
|
- Check for proper indentation, whitespace usage, and adherence to naming conventions.
|
|
|
|
5. Logic and Functionality:
|
|
- Analyze the code's logic and algorithms to ensure correctness and efficiency.
|
|
- Verify that the code accurately implements the intended functionality and produces the expected results.
|
|
- Look for any logical errors, edge cases, or potential bugs that could arise during execution.
|
|
- Consider the code's performance, scalability, and resource utilization.
|
|
|
|
6. Error Handling and Robustness:
|
|
- Review how the code handles errors, exceptions, and unexpected scenarios.
|
|
- Check if appropriate error handling mechanisms are in place, such as try-except blocks or logging.
|
|
- Verify that the code is resilient to various inputs and can gracefully handle edge cases or invalid data.
|
|
|
|
7. Security and Data Integrity:
|
|
- Assess the code for any potential security vulnerabilities or weaknesses.
|
|
- Check for proper input validation, sanitization, and protection against common security risks (e.g., SQL injection, XSS).
|
|
- Ensure that sensitive data is handled securely and any necessary encryption or hashing is implemented correctly.
|
|
|
|
8. Modularity and Reusability:
|
|
- Evaluate the code's modularity and separation of concerns.
|
|
- Check if the code is properly organized into functions, classes, or modules with clear responsibilities.
|
|
- Verify that the code promotes reusability and avoids duplication.
|
|
|
|
9. Testing and Test Coverage:
|
|
- Review the presence and adequacy of unit tests, integration tests, and any other relevant tests.
|
|
- Check if the tests cover critical paths, edge cases, and potential failure scenarios.
|
|
- Verify that the tests are well-structured, maintainable, and provide sufficient coverage.
|
|
|
|
10. Documentation and Comments:
|
|
- Assess the quality and completeness of the code's documentation, including inline comments and external documentation.
|
|
- Ensure that the documentation is up to date and accurately reflects the code's functionality and usage.
|
|
- Verify that complex code segments or algorithms are adequately explained through comments.
|
|
|
|
11. Collaboration and Feedback:
|
|
- Engage in collaborative discussions with the code author or team members to clarify any questions or concerns.
|
|
- Provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.
|
|
- Highlight areas of the code that are well-written and adhere to best practices.
|
|
|
|
12. Iteration and Follow-up:
|
|
- Ensure that any identified issues or suggestions are addressed and resolved satisfactorily.
|
|
- Verify that the necessary changes are implemented correctly and thoroughly tested.
|
|
- Conduct follow-up reviews if significant changes or refactoring are required.
|
|
|
|
Remember, the code review process should be collaborative, constructive, and focused on improving code quality, maintainability, and reliability. It's essential to approach code reviews with a positive mindset, providing clear and specific feedback while also recognizing and appreciating well-written code.
|
|
|
|
Adapt this framework to your team's specific needs, development methodology, and project requirements. Continuously refine and improve your code review process based on feedback and lessons learned to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency.
|
|
|
|
--- |