Files
the_information_nexus/tech_docs/docker_compose_guide.md

26 KiB
Raw Blame History

Learning-GOAL: “I can read, reason about and harden any Dockerfile or docker run incantation I meet—without drowning in trivia.”

Below is a minimal, language-agnostic curriculum expressed as executable pseudocode.
Each block is a self-contained kata you can type, break, fix and extend.

--------------------------------------------------
0.  Bootstrapping Sandbox
--------------------------------------------------
function bootstrap():
    vm = create_ephemeral_vm()          // multipass, lima, or cloud instance
    install("docker engine")            // or podman, nerdctl
    alias d="docker"
    return vm

--------------------------------------------------
1.  Core Primitives (must be muscle memory)
--------------------------------------------------
// 1.1 Image = read-only template
function image_primitives():
    img  = build("Dockerfile_hello")    // FROM alpine; COPY hello.sh /; CMD ["sh","/hello.sh"]
    tag  = tag(img, "demo:v1")
    id   = inspect(tag, ".Id")
    layers = history(tag)               // list of diff-IDs
    return {img, tag, id, layers}

// 1.2 Container = writable runtime instance
function container_primitives():
    c1 = run("-d --name c1 demo:v1")
    top   = exec(c1, "ps aux")          // whats running?
    delta = diff(c1)                    // which files changed?
    commit(c1, "demo:v1-smeared")       // bake delta into new image
    rm(c1)

// 1.3 Registry = image transport
function registry_primitives():
    reg = start_local_registry()        // docker run -d -p 5000:5000 registry:2
    push("demo:v1", reg)
    rmi("demo:v1")
    pull("demo:v1", reg)

--------------------------------------------------
2.  Storage & State (volumes, bind mounts, tmpfs)
--------------------------------------------------
function storage_primitives():
    vol  = volume_create("db_data")
    c2   = run("-d -v db_data:/var/lib/postgresql postgres:15")
    c3   = run("-d --mount src=$(pwd),dst=/src,type=bind alpine sh -c 'sleep 3600'")
    c4   = run("--tmpfs /tmp:size=100m alpine sh -c 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/big'")
    cleanup([c2,c3,c4])

--------------------------------------------------
3.  Networking (CNB model)
--------------------------------------------------
function networking_primitives():
    net = network_create("demo_net", driver="bridge")
    nginx = run("-d --net demo_net --name web nginx")
    curl  = run("--rm --net demo_net alpine/curl curl http://web")
    assert "Welcome to nginx" in curl.output
    rm(nginx); network_rm(net)

--------------------------------------------------
4.  Build Secrets & Multi-stage (no plaintext keys)
--------------------------------------------------
function build_hardening():
    // Dockerfile.multi
    //   FROM golang:1.22 AS build
    //   RUN --mount=type=secret,id=gh_token \
    //       git config --global http.extraheader "Authorization: Bearer $(cat /run/secrets/gh_token)"
    //   COPY . .
    //   RUN go build -o app .
    //   FROM gcr.io/distroless/static
    //   COPY --from=build /src/app /app
    //   CMD ["/app"]
    img = build("--secret id=gh_token,env=GH_TOKEN -f Dockerfile.multi .")
    scan(img)                           // trivy or grype

--------------------------------------------------
5.  Security Profiles
--------------------------------------------------
function security_primitives():
    c5 = run("--cap-drop ALL \
              --cap-add NET_BIND_SERVICE \
              --security-opt no-new-privileges:true \
              --user 1000:1000 \
              --read-only \
              --tmpfs /tmp \
              alpine:latest whoami")
    assert c5.stdout == "1000"

--------------------------------------------------
6.  Orchestration Lite (Compose as state-machine)
--------------------------------------------------
function compose_primitives():
    services = load("compose.yml")      // web, redis, db
    stack = compose_up(services)
    assert http_get("http://localhost:8080") == 200
    compose_down(stack)

--------------------------------------------------
7.  Observability & Debug (no black boxes)
--------------------------------------------------
function observability():
    c6 = run("-d demo:v1")
    logs_tail(c6)
    stats = container_stats(c6)         // cpu, mem, blkio
    enter(c6, "sh")                     // nsenter for low-level poke
    rm(c6)

--------------------------------------------------
8.  Cleanup Ritual
--------------------------------------------------
function cleanup(containers):
    for c in containers:
        stop(c, timeout=5)
        rm(c, volumes=True)
    system_prune(all=True)

--------------------------------------------------
9.  Mastery Checklist
--------------------------------------------------
can_i:
    ▢ explain the difference between an image, a layer, and a container
    ▢ build multi-stage with secrets and non-root user
    ▢ launch two containers on a custom bridge and capture traffic
    ▢ run a read-only container that still writes temporary files
    ▢ read `docker inspect` JSON and spot the security-options stanza
    ▢ translate a `docker run` one-liner into compose YAML and back
    ▢ upgrade base image without cache, then surgically bust only the vulnerable layer

--------------------------------------------------
10.  Exit Condition
--------------------------------------------------
if mastery_checklist.all_true():
    print("You now own the primitives.  Dive into BuildKit, rootless, or Kubernetes.")
else:
    iterate()

--------------------------------------------------
Usage Notes
--------------------------------------------------
- Replace every function with real shell commands (`docker build …`, `docker network create …`).  
- No single file is more than 40 lines; the goal is repetition, not rote memorization.  
- Re-run the entire pseudocode weekly on a fresh VM to avoid stale muscle memory.

Ah, I see—youre asking for a meta-comparison that aligns with your framing of "deterministic serendipity" (predictable yet flexible configurations) and focuses on functional parallels between Docker Compose and Talos Linuxs approach, even if their primary use cases differ. Lets reframe this as:


Deterministic Serendipity in Docker Compose vs. Talos Linux

Both tools aim to create predictable, repeatable environments but achieve this through opposing philosophies:

Dimension Docker Compose Talos Linux
Abstraction Layer Containers as objects in YAML. Kubernetes as the OS API (no containers directly visible).
Determinism Declarative YAML defines exact container states. Immutable OS ensures nodes always converge to desired k8s state.
Serendipity Flexibility via ad-hoc volumes: or build:. Rigid by design, but flexible within k8s (e.g., Helm charts).
Control Plane None (relies on Docker Engine). Built-in k8s control plane (etcd, scheduler).
Human Interface Direct (docker compose logs, shell access). Indirect (API-only, no shells or SSH).

Functional Overlaps (Where They Surprisingly Align)

  1. Declarative Configuration

    • Docker Compose: docker-compose.yml defines what runs.
    • Talos: machine-config.yaml defines how nodes bootstrap.
    • Both enforce desired state but at different layers (containers vs. nodes).
  2. Networking Isolation

    • Docker Compose: Custom networks isolate services (networks:).
    • Talos: CNI plugins (e.g., Calico) isolate pods via k8s policies.
  3. Secrets Management

    • Docker Compose: .env files or compromised secrets in YAML.
    • Talos: Integrated k8s Secrets + external Vault (secure by default).
  4. Scaling (Philosophically)

    • Docker Compose: Manual scaling (--scale) within a host.
    • Talos: Auto-scaling (HPA) across hosts via k8s.

Key Divergences (Where They Fundamentally Differ)

  1. Statefulness

    • Docker Compose: Volumes are host-bound (db_data:/data).
    • Talos: Volumes are cluster-wide abstractions (PVCs, CSI).
  2. Error Recovery

    • Docker Compose: Manual restarts (docker compose restart).
    • Talos: Self-healing (k8s reconciles state automatically).
  3. Flexibility vs. Rigidity

    • Docker Compose: Serendipity via bind mounts or runtime overrides.
    • Talos: Determinism via immutability—no ad-hoc changes allowed.

Meta-Philosophy

  • Docker Compose embraces "deterministic serendipity" by letting you tweak containers freely while keeping the YAML predictable.
  • Talos Linux eliminates serendipity entirely (no shells, no drift) to achieve pure determinism—but regains flexibility through k8s (e.g., Operators, Helm).

When to Choose Which

  • Docker Compose:

    • "I want containers to behave predictably but need to hack around locally."
    • Best for: Prototyping, local dev, or single-node deployments where human intervention is a feature.
  • Talos Linux:

    • "I want machines to behave predictably and never touch them again."
    • Best for: Production clusters where consistency and security trump flexibility.

Parting Thought

Both tools seek determinism, but:

  • Docker Compose constrains the container layer to enable human creativity.
  • Talos constrains the OS layer to enable machine reliability.

Is this closer to the meta comparison you were looking for? I can dive deeper into any axis (e.g., how "serendipity" manifests in Talos via k8s CRDs).


Your guide on Docker Compose is well-structured and comprehensive, but there are areas where you can improve clarity, depth, and readability. Below is a detailed review with suggestions for improvement:


General Feedback

  1. Title & Introduction

    • The term "Deterministic Serendipity" is intriguing but may confuse readers. Consider simplifying it or explaining it more clearly in the introduction.
    • The introduction could better emphasize why Docker Compose is useful (e.g., reproducibility, scalability, local development vs. production parity).
  2. Structure & Flow

    • The guide is well-organized, but some sections (e.g., User Management, Regular Updates) feel too brief compared to others.
    • Consider grouping related topics (e.g., Health Checks and depends_on since they work together).
  3. Tone & Audience

    • The guide is highly technical, which is great for advanced users, but beginners might struggle. Consider adding a prerequisites section (e.g., basic Docker knowledge).
    • Some explanations assume prior knowledge (e.g., IPAM, Watchtower). A brief definition would help.

Section-by-Section Improvements

1. Services

Strengths: Good coverage of key components and best practices.
📌 Suggestions:

  • Clarify depends_on vs. health checks (e.g., depends_on only waits for the container to start, not for the app inside to be ready).
  • Mention restart: unless-stopped or restart: always as a best practice for production.

2. Networks

Strengths: Clear explanation of custom networks.
📌 Suggestions:

  • Explain when to use bridge vs. host vs. overlay drivers.
  • Show how to link services across networks (e.g., frontend to backend).

3. Volumes

Strengths: Good distinction between named volumes and bind mounts.
📌 Suggestions:

  • Warn about filesystem permissions issues with bind mounts (common pain point).
  • Mention volume_driver for cloud storage (AWS EBS, NFS).

4. Profiles

📌 Suggestions:

  • Provide a real-world use case (e.g., debug vs. prod).
  • Show how to run a profile: docker compose --profile debug up.

5. Extensions

📌 Suggestions:

  • Clarify that deploy is ignored in docker compose up (only works with Swarm).
  • Mention restart_policy under deploy.

6. Environment Variables

Strengths: Good security advice.
📌 Suggestions:

  • Show how to pass secrets securely (e.g., secrets or Docker Swarm/Kubernetes integration).

7. Health Checks

📌 Suggestions:

  • Give an example of a failing health check (e.g., curl -f http://localhost/health).
  • Explain how health checks affect docker compose up --abort-on-container-exit.

8. User Management

📌 Suggestions:

  • Explain why running as root is bad (security risks).
  • Show how to handle permission issues (e.g., chown in Dockerfile).

9. Regular Updates

📌 Suggestions:

  • Warn about the risks of automatic updates (breaking changes).
  • Mention docker-compose pull as a manual alternative.

10. Documentation

📌 Suggestions:

  • Recommend docker-compose config to validate YAML files.
  • Suggest tools like hadolint for linting.

Missing Topics

  1. Secrets Management

    • How to use secrets with Docker Compose (e.g., for DB passwords).
    • Example:
      secrets:
        db_password:
          file: ./secrets/db_password.txt
      
  2. Multi-file Compose

    • How to split docker-compose.yml into docker-compose.prod.yml + docker-compose.dev.yml.
  3. Docker Compose vs. Kubernetes

    • Brief comparison (e.g., "Use Compose for local dev, Kubernetes for production").
  4. Troubleshooting

    • Common errors (e.g., port conflicts, missing volumes).
    • How to debug (docker compose logs, docker exec -it).

Writing Style

  • Some sentences are dense. Break them up for readability.
    "By treating everything as an object within the docker-compose.yml file, we can achieve deterministic serendipity—creating a configuration that is both predictable and flexible."
    "Docker Compose treats services, networks, and volumes as modular objects. This approach makes configurations predictable while allowing flexibility."

  • Use callouts for pro tips/warnings (e.g., ❗ Never hardcode secrets in YAML).


Example Improvements

Before

services:
  web:
    image: node:20
    ports:
      - "5000:5000"

After

services:
  web:
    image: node:20  # Use a specific version (avoid `latest`)
    ports:
      - "5000:5000"  # Host:Container mapping
    restart: unless-stopped  # Auto-recover on crashes

Conclusion

  • End with a next steps section (e.g., "Try refactoring an existing project using these best practices").
  • Link to official Docker Compose docs for deeper dives.

Final Verdict

This is a strong guide that just needs:

  1. More beginner-friendly explanations.
  2. Real-world examples (e.g., "Heres how a startup might use profiles").
  3. Coverage of missing topics (secrets, multi-file setups).

Would you like me to help rewrite any section in particular?


Deterministic Serendipity: A Comprehensive Guide to Mastering Docker Compose

Mastering Docker Compose: A Guide to Coding docker-compose.yml Files

Introduction

Docker Compose simplifies the process of defining and running multi-container Docker applications. This guide focuses on the essential components of the docker-compose.yml file, providing a clear understanding of how to structure and design your Docker Compose configurations.

Essential Components

Services

Description: Services are the core objects in a docker-compose.yml file, representing individual containers that make up your application.

Key Components:

  • image: Specifies the Docker image to use.
  • build: Specifies the build context for a Dockerfile.
  • ports: Maps container ports to host ports.
  • environment: Sets environment variables.
  • volumes: Mounts volumes or bind mounts.
  • depends_on: Defines startup dependencies.
  • healthcheck: Defines health check commands.
  • user: Specifies the user to run the container as.

Pseudocode:

services:
  web:
    image: "node:20"
    ports: ["5000:5000"]
    environment: ["NODE_ENV=production", "DB_HOST=db"]
    depends_on: ["db"]
    volumes: [".:/app"]
    user: "node"

  db:
    image: "postgres:15"
    volumes: ["db_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data"]
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U postgres"]
      interval: "10s"
      timeout: "5s"
      retries: 5

Networks

Description: Networks define how services communicate with each other.

Key Components:

  • name: Specifies the network name.
  • driver: Specifies the network driver (e.g., bridge).

Pseudocode:

networks:
  frontend:
  backend:

Volumes

Description: Volumes manage persistent storage for services.

Key Components:

  • name: Specifies the volume name.
  • driver: Specifies the volume driver (e.g., local).

Pseudocode:

volumes:
  db_data:

Systems Design Considerations

Modular Design

Best Practice: Each service should have a single responsibility to ensure clarity and maintainability.

Health Checks

Best Practice: Use health checks to ensure services are ready before starting dependent services.

Environment Variables

Best Practice: Use .env files to manage environment variables securely and avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the Compose file.

Non-Root Users

Best Practice: Run services as non-root users to enhance security.

Named Volumes

Best Practice: Use named volumes for persistent storage and bind mounts for development to share code between the host and container.

Custom Networks

Best Practice: Define custom networks to control how services communicate and use separate networks for different layers of your application (e.g., frontend and backend).

Conclusion

By focusing on the essential components and best practices outlined in this guide, you can ensure that your docker-compose.yml files are well-structured and logically designed. This approach will help you create configurations that are both predictable and flexible, making your Docker Compose setups more maintainable and scalable.


Introduction

Docker Compose is a powerful tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. By treating everything as an object within the docker-compose.yml file, we can achieve deterministic serendipity—creating a configuration that is both predictable and flexible. This guide aims to provide a highly technical and dense overview of the various components, best practices, and pitfalls to avoid, ensuring you can achieve mastery over your Docker Compose files.

Services

Overview

Services are the core objects in a Docker Compose file, representing individual containers that make up your application.

Key Components

  • image: Specifies the Docker image to use.
  • build: Specifies the build context for a Dockerfile.
  • ports: Maps container ports to host ports.
  • environment: Sets environment variables.
  • volumes: Mounts volumes or bind mounts.
  • depends_on: Defines startup dependencies.
  • healthcheck: Defines health check commands.
  • user: Specifies the user to run the container as.
  • deploy: Defines deployment configurations (e.g., resource limits).

Best Practices

  • Modular Design: Each service should have a single responsibility.
  • Health Checks: Ensure services are healthy before starting dependent services.
  • Environment Variables: Use .env files for managing environment variables.
  • Non-Root Users: Run services as non-root users to enhance security.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Hardcoding Secrets: Avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the Compose file.
  • Overuse of depends_on: Use depends_on with caution, as it only controls startup order, not health checks.

Example

services:
  web:
    image: node:20
    ports:
      - "5000:5000"
    environment:
      - NODE_ENV=production
      - DB_HOST=db
    depends_on:
      db:
        condition: service_healthy
    networks:
      - frontend
    user: "node"

  db:
    image: postgres:15
    volumes:
      - db_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U postgres"]
      interval: 10s
      timeout: 5s
      retries: 5
    networks:
      - backend

Networks

Overview

Networks define how services communicate with each other.

Key Components

  • name: Specifies the network name.
  • driver: Specifies the network driver (e.g., bridge).
  • ipam: Configures IP address management.

Best Practices

  • Custom Networks: Define custom networks to control how services communicate.
  • Isolation: Use separate networks for different layers of your application (e.g., frontend and backend).

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Default Networks: Avoid using the default network; define custom networks for better control.

Example

networks:
  frontend:
  backend:

Volumes

Overview

Volumes manage persistent storage for services.

Key Components

  • name: Specifies the volume name.
  • driver: Specifies the volume driver (e.g., local).
  • driver_opts: Configures driver options.

Best Practices

  • Named Volumes: Use named volumes for persistent storage.
  • Bind Mounts: Use bind mounts for development to share code between the host and container.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Hardcoding Paths: Avoid hardcoding paths in bind mounts; use environment variables or .env files.

Example

volumes:
  db_data:

Profiles

Overview

Profiles manage different configurations for different environments.

Key Components

  • profiles: Specifies the profiles for a service.

Best Practices

  • Environment-Specific Configurations: Use profiles to manage different environments (development, production, etc.).
  • Conditional Services: Enable or disable services based on the profile.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Overuse of Profiles: Use profiles judiciously to avoid complexity.

Example

services:
  debug:
    image: busybox
    profiles:
      - debug

Extensions

Overview

Extensions provide additional configurations for services.

Key Components

  • deploy: Defines deployment configurations (e.g., resource limits).
  • resources: Specifies resource limits (e.g., memory, CPU).

Best Practices

  • Resource Limits: Define resource limits to prevent services from monopolizing resources.
  • Deploy Configurations: Use deploy configurations for production setups.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Over-Configuring: Avoid over-configuring extensions; use only what is necessary.

Example

services:
  api:
    deploy:
      resources:
        limits:
          memory: 512M
          cpus: "1.0"

Environment Variables

Overview

Environment variables manage configuration and secrets.

Key Components

  • environment: Sets environment variables.
  • env_file: Specifies an environment file.

Best Practices

  • .env File: Use a .env file to manage environment variables securely.
  • Avoid Hardcoding: Avoid hardcoding sensitive information directly in the Compose file.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Insecure Storage: Avoid storing sensitive information in plaintext.

Example

services:
  web:
    environment:
      - NODE_ENV=production
      - DB_HOST=db
    env_file: .env

Health Checks

Overview

Health checks ensure services are healthy before starting dependent services.

Key Components

  • test: Specifies the command to run for the health check.
  • interval: Specifies the interval between health checks.
  • timeout: Specifies the timeout for health checks.
  • retries: Specifies the number of retries for health checks.

Best Practices

  • Conditional Dependencies: Use health checks to ensure services are ready before starting dependent services.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate Health Checks: Ensure health checks are robust and meaningful.

Example

services:
  db:
    image: postgres:15
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U postgres"]
      interval: 10s
      timeout: 5s
      retries: 5

User Management

Overview

User management ensures services run as non-root users.

Key Components

  • user: Specifies the user to run the container as.

Best Practices

  • Non-Root Users: Run services as non-root users to enhance security.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Running as Root: Avoid running services as root to reduce security risks.

Example

services:
  web:
    user: "node"

Regular Updates

Overview

Regular updates ensure containers are up to date with the latest security patches.

Key Components

  • Watchtower: Automates container updates.

Best Practices

  • Automate Updates: Use tools like Watchtower to keep your containers up to date.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Manual Updates: Avoid manual updates to reduce the risk of missing security patches.

Example

docker run -d --name watchtower \
  -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
  containrrr/watchtower

Documentation

Overview

Documentation ensures your docker-compose.yml file is understandable and maintainable.

Key Components

  • Comments: Adds comments to clarify configurations.

Best Practices

  • Clear Documentation: Add comments to your docker-compose.yml file to make it easier to understand.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Lack of Documentation: Avoid leaving your docker-compose.yml file uncommented.

Example

# Web service running Node.js API
services:
  web:
    image: node:20

Conclusion

By treating everything as an object within your docker-compose.yml file and following the best practices outlined in this guide, you can achieve deterministic serendipity—creating a configuration that is both predictable and flexible. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the key components, best practices, and pitfalls to avoid, ensuring you can master your Docker Compose files and achieve zen with your containerized applications.