101 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
101 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
You're absolutely right to call out loose terminology—this space is full of overloaded terms, and I should be more precise. Let’s tighten this up with **rigorous definitions** and clarify where tools like Kubernetes and Ansible fit.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **1. Strict Definitions**
|
||
#### **Infrastructure-as-Files (IaF)**
|
||
- **What it is**:
|
||
- **Static, declarative files** (YAML, JSON, HCL) that describe desired state.
|
||
- **No logic** (no loops, conditionals, or dynamic generation).
|
||
- **Manual/scripted application** (e.g., `kubectl apply -f`, `ansible-playbook`).
|
||
- **No state management** (applying files doesn’t track drift).
|
||
|
||
- **Examples**:
|
||
- Kubernetes manifests (`deployment.yaml`).
|
||
- Ansible playbooks (if purely declarative).
|
||
- Terraform `*.tf` files (if no dynamic blocks/modules).
|
||
|
||
#### **Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC)**
|
||
- **What it is**:
|
||
- **Programmatic** (Terraform, Pulumi, CDK) with logic (loops, conditionals, functions).
|
||
- **Stateful** (tracks actual vs. desired state, e.g., Terraform state files).
|
||
- **Automated workflows** (plan/apply, drift detection).
|
||
|
||
- **Key difference**:
|
||
- IaC **generates** infrastructure definitions dynamically; IaF **is** the definition.
|
||
|
||
#### **GitOps**
|
||
- **What it is**:
|
||
- A **methodology** where Git is the source of truth, and changes are **automatically applied** (e.g., ArgoCD, Flux).
|
||
- Can use **IaF or IaC** under the hood (e.g., Kubernetes YAML or Terraform plans).
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **2. Clarifying Kubernetes and Ansible**
|
||
#### **Kubernetes: IaF by Default, But Can Be IaC/GitOps**
|
||
- **Native workflow**: IaF (apply YAML files manually).
|
||
```sh
|
||
kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml # Pure IaF
|
||
```
|
||
- **IaC overlay**: Tools like `kustomize` (templating), Helm (logic), or Crossplane (provisioning) add IaC capabilities.
|
||
- **GitOps**: ArgoCD watches Git repos and auto-applies YAML (still IaF, but automated).
|
||
|
||
#### **Ansible: Hybrid IaF/IaC**
|
||
- **IaF mode**: Static playbooks (no dynamic logic).
|
||
```yaml
|
||
# playbook.yml (IaF)
|
||
- hosts: webservers
|
||
tasks:
|
||
- name: Install nginx
|
||
apt: name=nginx state=present
|
||
```
|
||
- **IaC mode**: When using Jinja2 templating, loops, or dynamic inventories:
|
||
```yaml
|
||
# IaC-like (dynamic)
|
||
- name: Install packages
|
||
apt: "name={{ item }} state=present"
|
||
loop: "{{ packages }}"
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **3. Why the Confusion?**
|
||
- **Overlap**: Many tools support both modes (e.g., Ansible can be IaF or IaC).
|
||
- **Marketing**: Vendors blur terms (e.g., calling Helm "IaC" when it’s templated IaF).
|
||
- **Evolution**: GitOps emerged as a pattern atop IaF/IaC.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **4. Decision Tree: Is It IaF or IaC?**
|
||
| **Tool/File** | **IaF?** | **IaC?** | **Notes** |
|
||
|----------------------|----------|----------|-----------|
|
||
| Kubernetes YAML | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | Unless templated (Helm/Kustomize). |
|
||
| Terraform `*.tf` | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | Dynamic blocks/modules make it IaC. |
|
||
| Ansible (static) | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | Pure YAML playbooks. |
|
||
| Ansible (dynamic) | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | Uses Jinja2/loops. |
|
||
| Docker Compose | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | Static YAML. |
|
||
| Pulumi (Python/TS) | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | Full programming model. |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **5. Key Takeaways**
|
||
1. **IaF** = Static files, no logic, manual apply.
|
||
- Example: Raw Kubernetes YAML, basic Ansible playbooks.
|
||
2. **IaC** = Code (logic, state, automation).
|
||
- Example: Terraform, Pulumi, dynamic Ansible.
|
||
3. **GitOps** = Automation layer atop IaF/IaC.
|
||
- Example: ArgoCD syncing Kubernetes YAML from Git.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **6. Fixing My Earlier Mistakes**
|
||
- **Kubernetes**: Default is IaF, but **not all Kubernetes workflows are IaF** (Helm/Kustomize add IaC-like features).
|
||
- **Ansible**: Can be **IaF or IaC** depending on use.
|
||
- **GitOps ≠ IaF**: GitOps automates IaF/IaC; they’re orthogonal concepts.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **Final Answer**
|
||
**IaF is a subset of IaC tooling**—it’s the "dumb YAML" layer. When you add logic/automation, it becomes IaC or GitOps. Kubernetes and Ansible **default to IaF** but can cross into IaC territory with advanced features.
|
||
|
||
Would you like concrete examples (e.g., "Here’s how the same app is defined in IaF vs. IaC")? I’m happy to dive deeper. |